NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07315-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010. After waiving your procedural rights to legal counsel and an administrative discharge board (ADB), the discharge authority directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, and on 30 August 1984, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07317-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the ‘existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07318-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2010. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07323-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. 07323-09 17 September 2010 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07324-09
a DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DBC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR), and an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07326-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. You underwent a pre-separation physical examination on 29 March 2005 and were found physically qualified for separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07333-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07334-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07337-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment and establish an extension agreement. 17 Nov 09 \X , W. DEAN P Executive D c
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07342-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07343-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record; the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07347-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board also believed that you were fortunate to receive a general discharge Since a separation under other than honorable conditions is often directed when a Marine is separated for misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07349-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official | naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07353-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07355-09
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 2 Jul 09 w/attachments (2) BUG Docket No: 1064-08 memo dtd 8 May 08 less enclosures (3) HQOMC MMPR memo dtd 18 Aug 09 (4) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, Gate of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07356-09
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07358-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 February 1973. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07359-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07361-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07363-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2010. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07365-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07366-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. After careful‘and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate che existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07371-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 20 August 2009. In this regard, the Board carefully considered your contentions and the statements you submitted in support of your application, but found those matters insufficient to demonstrate that you were wounded in 1944 under circumstances that would entitle you to the Purple Heart. Consequently, when applying.for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07376-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 16 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support - thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07377-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07380-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. In addition, the Board considered the report of the HQMC PERB, dated 3 June 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07383-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying his data in the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) by removing the weight control entry dated 14 August 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (2). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07385-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 28 August and 15 September 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07387-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PPRTRP Executive Dinac Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07388-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. You received nonjudicial punishment (NOP) for two instances of unauthorized absence (UA), failure to go to your appointed place of duty and malingering from 16 February until 25 July 2000. in your evaluation for the period of 1 September 1999 through 15 July 2000, it was stated in part, that you were continuously in limited duty status although you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07393-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07397-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07398-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. That code is often assigned in cases such as yours, where the enlistment is deemec erroneous because of previously undiagnosed, disqualifying psychological conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07401-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100cpa Docket No: 7401-09 5 October 2009 ° From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER agagiieeeoseemes Meme REVIEW OF - NAVAL’ RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 8 August 2007. Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07403-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2009. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 15 June 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07405-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07408-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07409-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter _referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07412-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Conseguently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07416-09
Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07418-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a prorated amount of retroactive Additional Special Pay (ASP) and Incentive Special Pay (ISP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07419-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07420-09
Documentary material ‘considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. -After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07422-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 12 June 1990, an ADB recommended by majority vote that you be separated with a general discharge for misconduct (drug abuse).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07426-09
7426-09 23 Feb 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. On 19 May 2009, Petitioner’s Commanding Officer approved the reenlistment request. After reviewing the circumstances, N130 granted Petitioner a “waiver” to the limitation that “Commands must submit SRB requests via OPINS 35-120 days in advance of the sailor's EAOS or reenlistment date” provided Petitioner reenlist on 2 July 2009 as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07427-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07428-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You served on active duty in the Navy from 23 August to 23 December 2005 when you were discharged by reason of erroneous entry due to chronic knee pain. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07436-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07437-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07439-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an extension agreement. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009...