NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07441-09
7441-09 29 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she reenlisted USNR(FTS) vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. 4Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07444-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07446-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07448-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS’ 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 | Lec Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH}for designated location of dependent spouse, Cost of Living Allowance (COLA), and Overseas Housing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07450-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ing for a correction of an official naval Consequently, when applyl record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07455-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code he was assigned on 10 July 2009. c. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of reentry codes of RE-3G or RE-4 to individuals discharged by reason of a condition not a disability. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 10 July 2009, he was assigned a reentry code of RE-3G.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07458-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 1160 Ser N130D1/09U0763 of 16 Oct: 09, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07460-09
RK three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010. The discharge authority directed your commanding officer to discharge you under honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07469-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 1 April 2010. On 28 September 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied your request for service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder, after determining that the disorder was not related to your military service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07471-09
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010. Finally, Marines with a record of misconduct, substandard performance, and failure to pay just debts normally receive discharges under other than honorable conditions, and as such, the Board noted that you were fortunate to receive a general characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07472-09
7472-09 17 Dec O09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD [to Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to travel of dependents from “ (One ‘Also, payment of associated station allowances, Temporary Lodging...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07475-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board - considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1040 MMEFA dtd 8 Sep 09, a copy of which is attached, After careful and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07476-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. 7476-09 6 Apr 10 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07477-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07478-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to an additional 41 days credit toward his retirement multiplier under the provisions of paragraph 2.2.3, DOD INST 1340.19 for public service performed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07480-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your daughter’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07483-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LOC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of separation pay when he was discharged on 30 June 2009. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07484-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2009. On 23 May 2007 you were separated from the Navy with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07486-09
ner DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Lee Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record he corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07490-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The record does not reflect the disciplinary action taken, if any, for this 56 day period of UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07494-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board carefully considered the medical evidence you submitted in support of your application but found it insufficient to warrant corrective action in your case. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07496-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected. The Petitioner executed a 12 month agreement to extend enlistment, (NAVPERS 1070/621) operative on or about 2¢ August 2008. c. The Petitioner executed a 23 month agreement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07497-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07500-09
_A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. The Board also noted that you were fortunate to receive a general discharge, because normally when an individual is separated for misconduct, he is given an other than honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07502-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on’ 23 September 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was - insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07504-09
You requested correction of your record to show, in effect, that you did not suffer from a personality disorder and that you were assigned a more favorable reentry code than RE-4. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant.to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07506-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07509-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 pIC Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2} HOMC Memo 1040 MMEBA dtd 22 Oct O39 (3) Subject’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B”" Selective Reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07514-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service or reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07516-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 bc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus {SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. 4salman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07521-09
7521-09 29 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to.a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07522-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval | Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 19 August 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07524-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show that he received an honorable discharge on 14 August 1962. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 14 August 1962. b. MINORITY CONCLUSION: concludes that the available evidence is insufficient fo demonstrate that Petitioner was discharged for engaging in consensual homosexual activity.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07526-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07527-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07528-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the reenlistment code or characterization of your discharge,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07531-09
A three-member panel’ of the Board for Correction of Naval o-oo: ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07534-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07538-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07544-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2009. Documentary material - Considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07549-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its review of your application, the Board carefully considered your unsubstantiated contention to the effect that you were the victim of unfair treatment, which contributed to your acts of indiscipline and that you were denied due process but found them insufficient to demonstrate that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07567-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. IN REPLY REFER TO: 1133 Ser 32/ AUG 48 2009 From: Commander, Navy Recruiting Command To: Executive Director, Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07570-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07577-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. On 29 April 1975, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07587-09
You requested completely removing the fitness reports for 4 February to 15 May 2006, 3 April to 2 July 2007,and 3 July to 13 October 2007. You further requested, if the report for 4) February to 15 May 2006 is not completely removed, that it be modified by removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer's comments), “from an external perspective.” | Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report for 3 July to 13 October 2007 by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07590-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07591-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 October 2009 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07602-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). 7602-09 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner’s command submitted a request via OPINS on 23 January 2009 seeking authorization for Petitioner to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07609-09
h. On 4 March 2009, applicant’s command submitted the SRB request into OPINS. The applicant requests that that his naval record be corrected to show that he was authorized a bonus with an award level of 0.5 (for the AT rating) for the reenlistment 9 March 2009. If the SRB request had been entered in OPINS in a more timely manner, Petitioner would have most likely been authorized to reenlist for a bonus on 9 March 2009 with an award level of 0.5.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07610-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2010. The Board found that you entered active duty in the Navy on 15 July 1986. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.