DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No. 7408-03
8 Sep 09
Dear =i ian i
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your. application on 8
September 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1000 PERS-
312A/50 of 24 Aug 09, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection,. the Board substantially concurred with the comments
“éontained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application, and
your request for a personal appearance before the Board, have been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
it is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
has
W. DEAN PF
Executive D r
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY ORIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1000
PERS-312A/50
24 Aug 2009
From: Commander, Navy Personnel Command
To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Via; Assistant, Board for Correction of Naval Records
(Pers-31C)
Subj: ADVISORY OPINION Ico al
Ref: (a) BCNR Docket Number 7408-09
1. It is our opinion that reference (a) be disapproved. The
member’s service record does not support the fact that Sele
7 Wa was the home of record at the time he reported
to active duty on 19 February 1987. His service record shows
aa MM as his home of record.
to? yf baw
ic eta. pF
R. HAYES
By direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08382-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted-of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02819-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04152-07
Accordingly, your request for FLPP has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Since $AAMAMMMIB did not have a prior test on record, there is no way to determine his language capability during the time he was in@maiiiemae The test he took upon his return showed his skill level after two years of immersion in the language, which may not be an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03970-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1000 BUPERS 325 dtd 23 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01468-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04946-07
4946—07 28 Aug 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01460-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02478-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07040-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06087-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...