Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07358-09
Original file (07358-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 7358-09
14 September 2010

 

 

This is in reference to your request for further consideration of

your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to
the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section

L562 .

R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 July 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of thas
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations

and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 15
February 1973. You received nonjudicial punishment and were
convicted by a special court-martial for offenses that included
two periods of unauthorized absence, willful disobedience of a
lawful order, violation of a lawful general regulation, use of
provoking words, and leaving place of duty without authority.

On 25 February 1977 a general court-martial convened and found
you guilty of attempting to sell marijuana, conspiracy to possess
and sell marijuana, possession of marijuana, transfer of
marijuana, and endeavoring to create false information. The
court sentenced you to forfeiture of all pay and allowances,
reduction in rate, and a bad conduct discharge. You received the

bad conduct discharge on 1 December 1977.

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall

service record, passage of time, and the contention that
posttraumatic stress disorder caused your misconduct. The Board
concluded that those factors were insufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge, given the nature and
severity of your offenses. Further, there is no credible
evidence to show that you suffered from a mental disorder while
in the Marine Corps. In addition, even if you had symptoms of a
mental condition during your period of active duty, there is no
indication in the record that you did not know right from wrong
or were unable to adhere to the right. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

  
  
 

W. DJ
Executive

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00646-04

    Original file (00646-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of you application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulation and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entirerecord, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 February 1977. You received nonjudicial...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01817-11

    Original file (01817-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2011. Your sentence included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or tnjustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07871-98

    Original file (07871-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. foregoing factors were insufficient to warrant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00374-12

    Original file (00374-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 July 1973, you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of wrongful possession of 632 grams of Marijuana. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00344-06

    Original file (00344-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 September 1975 at age 18. It is clear from the record that several...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12680-09

    Original file (12680-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2010. On 6 August 1982, after appellate review, you received the BCD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03152-05

    Original file (03152-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08308-10

    Original file (08308-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03349-02

    Original file (03349-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. At that time you denied suicidal ideation On 19 February 1982, after undergoing a You were sentenced to a $900 forfeiture paygrade E-l. On 12 April 1982 you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03883-07

    Original file (03883-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 September 1977 at age 17 and served for seven months without...