DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20376-5100 .
SIN
Docket No: 07182-0989
27 August 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552. :
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 August 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with. administrative
regulations and procedures applicabie to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 30 June
2009, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider.its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
““PFAN PRET
Executive Di
Enelosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VA 22134-8103
: IN REPLY REFER TO:
10406
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN TEE CASE OF FORMERs
Encl: (1) NavMC 118 (21)
(2) CO, RTR, PI, SC ltr 1900 of 20 Nov 07
(3) DD Form 214
(4) Form “449 of 3 Mar 09
- service record has been reviewed and it has been determined
that at ie time of separation he was assigned a reenlistment code of RE~ 3P,
which means failure to meet physical /medi.cal standards for reenlistment.
anemia veceived an ‘uncharacterized’ ‘discharged from the U.S. Marine
coupe on November 20; 2007. A review ‘of the. administrative portion of his
recerd shows that he was informed.of the reenlistment code RE-3P with
narrative reason of “Condition not a disability". SRM was diagnosed
with chronic anterior pain to his left knee.
3. After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters concurs in
the professional evaluation of RMI 321i tications for reenlistment
at the time of separation. Once a code is correctly assigned it is not
routinely changed or upgraded as a result of events that occur after
separation or based merely on the passage of time. The code may, however, be
waived at the discretion of the acquiring brarich of service per their own
policies and regulations.
4. Enclosure (4) is returned for final ac
Frances S. Poleto
Head, Performance Evaluation
Review Branch
Manpower Management Division
By the direction of the Commandant
Of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11088-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, LyQaas W. DEAN PFE Pxecutive Dareator Enclosure wEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04316-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. qualifi- Once a code The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an 4 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03211-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reenlistment code was assigned based on her overall record and means that she did not meet the physical/ medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. Once a code The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an 4 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06578-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05850-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The reenlistment code was assigned based on his overall record and means that he did not meet the physical/ medical standards for reenlistment at the time of separation. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06033-01
You requested that your reenlistment code of RE-3P (failure to meet physical (medical) standards) be changed. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. send his application directly to the Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records, Department of the Navy, Washington, DC 20370-5100. to his application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05415-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05712-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, Performance Evaluation Review Branch, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 22 34-5103REFER TO: MMR/RE June 26 2006MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06851-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 27 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02955-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, the Board noted that your DD Form 214 erroneously indicates that you were discharged...