Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06673-09
Original file (06673-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

DIC

Docket No. 6673-09
9 September 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

8 September 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1040 MMEA dtd 3
Aug 09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter net previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\p Ques

- W. DEAN PFREIR®E
Executive Di t

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103

IN REPLY REFER TO:

10406
MMEA
3 Aug 09

 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS

 

Subj: BCNR DOCKET NUMBER 06673-09; REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN
THE CASE © assis ec ceaea

 

Ref: (a) MARADMIN 305/09 dtd 8 May 2009

 

1. We have carefully reviewed Millie cequest and

the following comments are provided.

 

2. On 5 June 2009, _ Mubmitted a 48-month
reenlistment to this headquarters and his request was approved on 10
June 2009. Subsequently, he executed his reenlisted on 22 June 2009.

3. Per reference (a), all Fiscal Year 2009 Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB(s)) are suspended for the remainder of the FY for all but the nine
Military Occupation Specialty (MOS(s)) listed below, irrespective of
reenlistment zone and Expiration of Current Contract (ECC). For example,
an FYO9 or FY10 0369 career Marine at zone ¢c who executes a reenlistment
31 days from the release of this MARADMIN will no longer receive an SRB.
The only exception to this policy is for the nine MOS(S) listed below,
regardless of reenlistment zone: 0211, 0231, 0261, 0321, 0431, 0861, 2336,
2671, and 2834,

4. In accordance with the above direction, this headquarters recommends

reenlistment authority remain unchanged with no
SRB.

 

P. J. FERRARO
Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps
Head, Enlisted Assignments Branch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03773-09

    Original file (03773-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Sincerely, TR QOD tomeae Foe W. DEAN PFEIFFER es | Executive Director ( Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD © QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1040 MMEA 26 May 09 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BCNR DOCKET NO 03773-09; REQUEST...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05561-05

    Original file (05561-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5561-05 23 August 2005This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 August 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02936-07

    Original file (02936-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2936-07 2 July 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07059-09

    Original file (07059-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), and a Operational Forces (OPFOR) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2009 and, pursuant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07312-99

    Original file (07312-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CMC memorandum attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ?#%S MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BCNR DOCKET OF STAFF **1;, We have reviewed Staff Sergeant 1. his request for a contract modification and subsequent entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be denied.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03662-09

    Original file (03662-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTIGN OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), and a Operational Forces (OPFOR) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04824-09

    Original file (04824-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20870-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), and a Operational Forces {OPFOR) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03000 11

    Original file (03000 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. This change upon completion of MOS training will entitle the member to a zone “A” SRB for MOS 0321, which is capped at $57,500 for 48 months...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10046-06

    Original file (10046-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC Memo 1040 M~4EA dtd 8 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07017-09

    Original file (07017-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter - referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...