Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06661-09
Original file (06661-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

DIC

Docket No. 6661-09
3 September 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

8 September 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/491
dtd 15 Jul 09, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice,

Sincerel,

\s

W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dikdcher

Enclosure
}
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

 

1160

Ser 811/491
15 Jui 09

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via: PERS-31¢c

 

Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO

   

“ow ~
Ref: (a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 23 Jun 09
(b) OPNAVINST 1160.84

(c) NAVADMIN 125/07
{a) NAVADMIN 251/07

 

Enci: (1) BCNR File

1. Per references (a) through (c), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner’s request.

2. The petitioner is requesting to be paid SRB at a higher award
level.

3. The petitioner reenlisted for SRB on 1 Oct 2007 for SRB.
Reference (d) released on 2 Oct 2007 increased her SRB award level
from 1.0 to 2.0. Navy Personnel Command/OPNAV cannot provide
information pertaining to subsequent: SRB NAVADMINs until the NAVADMIN
has been released. Therefore the petitioner could not have been
counseled concerning reference (d) prior to the reenlistment.
Petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient grounds to change the
reenlistment date as no error or injustice was committed.

4. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as
is.

5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the

Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is
returned. ,

OZ AT I
{
C, E, ATMESTILLMAN
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression
Ss wee &,

ae .
att

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05798-09

    Original file (05798-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06120-09

    Original file (06120-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. o Sincerely, Executive Enclosure 4 VEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY , NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND - 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 1160 : Ser 811/464 10 Jul 09 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-31C Subj: BCNR PETITION co? This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09130-07

    Original file (09130-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/043 dtd 14 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09042-07

    Original file (09042-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/042 dtd 14 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08932-07

    Original file (08932-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. The petitioner reenlisted for four years on 07 May 2007.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05253-09

    Original file (05253-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and , applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00135-09

    Original file (00135-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Per references (a) through (¢), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09

    Original file (05600-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01659-09

    Original file (01659-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is en the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references (a) through (d), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07

    Original file (06780-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...