DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 6535-09
12 November 2010
This is in reference to your request for further consideration of
your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to
the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section
Labe .
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 November 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 September
1991. For the period 16 November 2002 to 15 April 2003 you
received an adverse evaluation. It stated that you received
nonjudicial punishment and had an inability to handle stress that
was evident in frequent outbursts and lack of motivation. You
had frequent verbal flare-ups and a negative attitude extremely
detrimental to good order and discipline and team building, and
set a bad example for subordinates. You were honorably released
from active duty by reason of expiration of term of service on 1
August 2003. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4 to
indicate that you were not eligible for reenlistment.
The Board carefully considered your desire in effect to return to
active duty; however it was not persuaded that your reentry code
was assigned in error, or that its continued presence in your
record is unjust. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
gonsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
a&gecord, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
xistence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
. DEAN
Executive
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01577-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It concluded that it would not be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code, Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06103-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08226-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01596-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 November 2010. Since your discharge is less than 15 years old, you may apply to fthe Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible upgrade. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11516-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. You received the bad conduct discharge on 9 February 2005 and were assigned an RE-4 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04585-09
‘Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board carefully considered your contention to the effect that your reentry code should be corrected because it is unjust and unfair. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04090-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. In this regard, the Board noted that the VA assigned ratings to the lumbosacral strain and radiculopathy without regard to the issue of your fitness to reasonably perform military duty prior to your discharge, and that the rating you received for a mood disorder was based on your condition more than eighteen months after you were discharged from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01530-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Subsequently, on 1 June 2003 you were separated with an honorable discharge and given an RE-4 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04073-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, appiicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are separated by reason of fraudulent entry. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10283-09
The Board noted that applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder. The Board further noted the diagnosed personality disorder, you depression, suicidal ideation, and the fact that you were threat to harm to yourself if placed in stressful situations. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...