NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05706-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2009. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general discharge because of your substandard performance and conduct, civil conviction, and since your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05708-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board’ requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2009 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05710-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not Gemonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05712-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5712-09 26 October 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05721-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probabie...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05723-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2010. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. In addition, it found that you failed to submit any evidence which is probative of your contention to the effect...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05726-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter: referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective ~ action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05732-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on 4 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in ‘Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05737-09
Paragraph 3102a provided, in part, that a case entered the Navy disability evaluation system when an MEB was dictated for the purpose of evaluating the diagnosis and treatment of a member who was unable to return to military duty because the member’s condition most Likely was permanent, and/or any further period the member to full duty. SECNAVINST 5420,.193, 19 November 1997, enclosure 1 (codified as 32 CFR 723), section 3e(2), provides that the Board may deny an application 4£ it...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05742-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 5742-09 18 June 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj ay OR NAVAL RECORD OF Walitii é Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Reserve, filed an application with this Board ‘requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve and to the Retired List vice being discharged on 8 December 1992. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05743-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in ‘gupport thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05759-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It should be from 15 July 1986 to 1 September 1986, the period of confinement from the sentence of your special court-martial.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05761-09
Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the “Proficiency” /"“Conduct” marks assigned for 27 duly 2005, “2.0"/"1.9" (copy of pertinent data from the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) is in enclosure (2)). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05770-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DUC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05772-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05773-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. After Waiving your procedural rights, the discharge authority directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 10 January 1992, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05781-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05782-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05784-09
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05785-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05787-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05789-09
- A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05790-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2009. The VA granted your request on a presumptive basis because your condition was diagnosed within eight years of your release from active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05792-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05794-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05798-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05802-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05811-09
5811-09 28 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USN vice USNR. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05822-09
A three-member panel‘of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August’ 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the — existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05823-09
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Lippolis, Sproul and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 August 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05829-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Director, NNCAP, Navy Medicine Manpower, Personnel Training and Education Command dated 11 December 2009 with enclosures, a copy of which is attached less enclosures. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05838-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2009. You were so discharged on 1 February 1996, upon the completion of the appellate review of your conviction and sentence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05847-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05848-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 PERS- 812 of 27 July 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant tc demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05850-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 September 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was snsufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05851-09
You requested setting aside action to effect your involuntary retirement on 1 October 2009. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2010. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05852-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to-the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitiement to an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit {EBCC) . The Board, consisting cf Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and 4salman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05859-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05860-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05862-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05863-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "“B”" Selective Reenlistment Bonus {SRB). Additionally, any sailors whose award level decreased who already had an SRB approval message pending for a reenlistment date after 10 March 2009 was required to submit a request for a new reenlistment date of 10 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05864-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05866-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personne! Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05871-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05876-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. Documentary material consigered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05882-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that any of the additional conditions rated by the VA rendered you unfit to reasonably perform your Military duties, and that you were entitled to a combined rating from the Department of the Navy of 30% or higher, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05890-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s rank prior to commissioning was as an E-7 vice E-6. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05898-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05916-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Cc Docket No. 5916-09 1 Sep 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO ss a ine ta ical aaa si oes i ab ae Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/471 of 13 Jul 09 (3) Subject's naval record 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05919-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...