DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE
Docket No. 05723-09
17 September 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16
September 2010. After careful consideration of your application,
the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and
that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure
to submit your application in a timely manner. In addition, it found
that you failed to submit any evidence which is probative of your
contention to the effect that your disability was caused by a
combat-related event. It also noted that as you were not serving on
orders that specified a period of service in excess of thirty days,
there was no basis or authority for extending your period of active
duty or issuing you a DD Form 214 for your fourteen day period of
duty.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must
include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably
available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence
may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application
is not possible.
Sincerely, )
\w Nias
Executive
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07918-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2010. The Board concluded that you were aware of the alleged error or injustice in your record when you were released from active duty in 1994 and discharged by reason of misconduct/drug abuse in 1995, witha discharge under other than honorable conditions. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00247-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2010. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02636-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards (SECNAVCORB) dated 1 July 2009 and 6 January 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05646-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02264-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12776-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in three NUP’s, conviction by SPCM for periods of UA totaling over five months, and the fact that you were given an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12305-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 9 June 1978, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00290-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2010. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were not physically qualified for release from active duty on 2 October 2008, or that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 27 May 2009, when you were discharged by reason of physical fitness assessment failure, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05860-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00278-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.