DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS ©
Docket No: 5794-09
23 March 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 February 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 December
2000. On 25 December 2003 you received an enlisted performance
evaluation that marked you 2.0 in knowledge. On 25 December 2004
you acknowledgea not being recommended for reenlistment due to
receiving an average less than 3.0 in any trait during your
enlistment. You were honorably released from active duty on 25
December 2004, and assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of a RE-4 reentry
code to individuals who receive an average less than 3.0 in any
trait during their current enlistment. As you have not
demonstrated that your reentry.code is erroneous or unjust, the
Board concluded that there is no basis for changing it, and
denied your application. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\pSSamed
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dil
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00198-99
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were ordered to The The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 26 August 1991 for eight years at age 20. active duty for a period of two years on 4 December 1991. record reflects that you were advanced to SN (E-3) and served without incident until...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06210-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04571-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2008. The Board concluded that those factors were insufficient to warrant corrective action, given your substandard conduct and overall trait averages, and the diagnosis which resulted in your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03496-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02969-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. nonjudicial punishments were more than sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00613-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the @%iSstence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11945-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that you were fortunate to receive a general characterization of service, because individuals who are separated for misconduct such as yours normally receive an other than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10931-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that your discharge and reenlistment code should not be changed because of your acts of misconduct and insufficiently high trait mark average. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07858-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that your general discharge and reenlistment code should not be changed due to your diagnosed personality disorder and insufficiently high conduct mark average. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11778-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 August 2011. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be changed due to your diagnosed personality disorder and insufficiently high overall trait mark average. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.