DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 05860-09
1 October 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23
September 2010. After careful consideration of your application,
the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and
that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure
to submit your application in a timely manner. The Board concluded
that you were aware of the alleged error or injustice in your record
when you were discharged in 2001 without entitlement to disability
benefits administered by the Department of the Navy.
In addition, the Board was not persuaded that you were unfit for duty
because of a mental disorder that incurred in or aggravated by your
naval service. In this connection, it substantially concurred with
the enclosed rationale of the hearing panel of the Physical
Fvaluation Board that considered your case on 24 July 2001.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must
include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably
available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence
may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application
is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07333-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07333-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11028-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As a result of this action, on 16 August 2001, you submitted a written request for an administrative separation due to parenthood.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07641-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board’s file on your previous case, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00473-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge and your reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12531-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 September 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that applicable Navy regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on medical conditions that existed prior to entry into the service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02258-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04118-10
A Navy medical record dated 23 October 2000 (AR 352) indicates that you “recently retired”. In addition, your name and Fleet Reserve status would have been listed in the DEERS database, which is consulted by medical personnel when there is a question concerning a patient’s right to medical care at a military medical treatment facility. A service member does not enter on active duty and/or become entitled to active duty pay simply because a Department of the Navy officer or employee orally...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07966-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Unfortunately after a little more than one year of creditable service you received an other than honorable discharge (OTH) due to misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05882-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that any of the additional conditions rated by the VA rendered you unfit to reasonably perform your Military duties, and that you were entitled to a combined rating from the Department of the Navy of 30% or higher, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective...