NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05476-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 Lce 5476-09 23 Jun 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL R co Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05479-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he is not indebted for shipping his household goods (HHG) from i - NI at government expense. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 July 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05480-09
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05488-09
“A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3‘June 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05498-09
The record does not reflect the disciplinary action taken, if any, for this period of UA. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service in the Army, desire to upgrade your discharge, explanation regarding the circumstances of your discharge, and the passage of time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05501-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his retirement on 1 November 2008 was in the grade of Chief Warrant Office 4 (CWO4), rather than CWO3, as he was promoted to CWO4 effective 1 October 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Delorier, Pfeiffer and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05505-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted © of your application, together with.all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05513-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 2 March 2009, On 15 March 2009. your commanding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05516-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your husband’s record on 10 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05518-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05519-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05522-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05523-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 20 August 1985, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05529-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Under the terms of your enlistment contract, you were required to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05530-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05553-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05555-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ' 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 MEH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e}) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05560-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05561-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. your allegations of error and injustice .were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your request for discharge was granted and on 26 March 1971, you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05563-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Full Time Support {FTS) , Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Fealman, Mr. George, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05564-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05569-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX “5100 WASHINGTON DC 20370 ORS Docket No: 5569-09 & June 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF Subj: FORMER 4 NAVAL REC Ref: (a) Title 10 U:S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05573-09
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05574-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per references (a) through (c), recommend disapprovai to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05576-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05581-09
2B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code, characterization of service or separation code due to your performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05583-09
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered ‘the advisory opinions from Headquarters Marine Corps dated 16 July and 11 August 2009, copies of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05585-08
| A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of “your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05585-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05586-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05587-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 28 July 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ht ape and i. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 December 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 13 June 2008.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05589-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted o£ your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty on 1 July 1995 because of the back condition and/or the diabetes mellitus, and that you should have received a combined disability rating from the Department of the Navy of 30% or higher, the Board was unable to recommend corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05598-09
The Board did not reconsider your request for upgrade of your discharge because you did not submit any new material evidence jin support of that request. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval sitting in executive session, considered your new Your allegations of error and cordance with administrative licable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05600-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05606-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJN Docket No: 05606-09 29 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. (a), Petitioner, a former officer of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her record be ~ corrected to show that she transferred to the Retired Reserve list vice being discharged on 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05615-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05627-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he elected to convert from the Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2009 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05628-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 22 dune 2009 with enclosures, a COPY of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05637-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05646-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05661-09
need you in connection with the court-martial conviction, on 92 June 1955, you were assigned 1.0 mark in conduct. On 31 July 1955 while in confinement you were assigned a mark of zero in conduct. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your period of good service and contentions, in effect, that you have been a good citizen for many years and that the court-martial was set aside and that therefore you should not have been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05664-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05669-09
+ : A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged for fraudulent entry and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05684-09
NAVADMIN 006/09 also reiterated the requirement that, “All SRB reenlistment requests are required to be submitted via OPINS 35-120 days prior to the requested reenlistment date.” See enclosure (3). n. On 8 April 2009, the OPINS request was approved for an award level of 0.5 by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC). 27 October 2009 Reviewed and approved.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05688-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05689-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2 : o370 S10aRS Docket No: 5698-09 15 June 2009 From: Chairman, Board for. Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER = iiiis Mm REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form i49 (2) Subject's naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05693-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05694-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus: (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05697-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05705-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive sassion, considered your application on 29 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...