DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DS 20370-5100
Lee
Docket No. 5516-09
10 Aug 09
Dear Sitti...
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
deceased husband's naval record pursuant to the provisions of
10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your husband’s record on
10 August 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice in his
records were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations
and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,
your husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion
furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/457 of 9 July 2009, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request. Also, our review of your husband's service
record reveals no evidence of participation in Golden Gloves Boxing,
however you may request copies of records by completing and submitting
the attached SF 180 to the National Personnel Records Center (Military
Personnel Records), 9700 Page Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63132-5100.
It is regretted that the circumstances of the case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely, ap
W. DEAN PF R
Enclosures Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01194-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval records and ; applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07744-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04523-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted.in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01231-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04149-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. His aptitude for naval service was “2,0.” On 3 October 1944, your husband requested cancellation of his resignation request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10065-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 8 March 1956 he was honorably discharged from the Navy Reserve with 13 years, 3 months, and 21 days of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01628-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 November 2009. your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your late husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your late husband's discharge because of the seriousness of his misconduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09877-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11107-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09433-08
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 2009. The Board found that you also certified on the DD 2656 that you were aware that your husband’s retired pay would stop when he dies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.