Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05501-09
Original file (05501-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .

 

HD :hd
Docket No. 05501-0939
6 August 2009

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

    

Subj: tao
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: {1} DD Form 149 dtd 5 May 09 w/attachments
{2} PERS-822 memo dtd 14 Jul 09 w/ref (c)

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected to show his retirement on 1 November 2008
was in the grade of Chief Warrant Office 4 (CWO4), rather than
CWO3, as he was promoted to CWO4 effective 1 October 2008. He
Specifically requested that his DD Form 214 ("Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty") be corrected to show his
grade as CWO4, vice CWO3.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Delorier, Pfeiffer and
Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 6 August 2009, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enciosures and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.° In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office with
cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's request
commented to the effect it has merit and warrants favorable
action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where
appropriate, to show his retirement on 1 November 2008 was in
the grade of CWO4, vice CWO3; and that his DD Form 214 be
corrected accordingly.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with the
Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an
appropriate location in Petitioner's naval record, and that
another copy of this report be returned to this Board, together
with any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
record, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such
purpose.

4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c})) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

DowRed/ £, Ca7Bee

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)}
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

LA |
Walk

Executive Dir

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12160-09

    Original file (12160-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board did not consider her request for remedial consideration, as she has been selected and promoted to. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00025-09

    Original file (00025-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 00025-0989 22 February 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ees Ref: (a) 1210 U.S.C. Mr 3 , reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. Enclosures...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02804-08

    Original file (02804-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 4 (CWO4) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 CWO4 Selection Board, by which he was not considered, vice the FY 2007...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08569-09

    Original file (08569-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By enclosure (2), he amended his application, as it relates to the report for 1 May 2007 to 30 April 2008, to request that the report be modified, by removing section K (reviewing officer's marks and comments), rather than completely removed. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Fales and Grover, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03811-10

    Original file (03811-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), counsel for Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of Chief Warrant Officer 3 (CWO3) Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01968-10

    Original file (01968-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    HOMC has advised that Subject was discharged on 1 November 2009 on the basis of failures of selection by the FY 2009 and 2010 CWO3 Selection Boards. Because of the two failures of selection for promotion, he was discharged from the Marine Corps Reserve on 1 November 2009.” CONCLUSION: Delete the sentence “If he fails of selection by the FY 2011 promotion board, the Board finds that failure of selection should be removed as well, since it must be removed to restore the status Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02007-06

    Original file (02007-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 CWO3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2006 CWO3 Selection Board. They specifically...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00832-03

    Original file (00832-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his retirement on 30 June 1990 was in the grade of chief warrant officer 4 (CWO4), vice chief warrant officer 3 (CW03). (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice RECOMMENDATION: a. y and allowances ‘DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06939-09

    Original file (06939-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DO 20370-5100 . The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10850-02

    Original file (10850-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 4 (CWO4) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 CWO4 Selection Board, vice the FY 2003 CWO4 Selection Board. After he had been...