NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09835-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09836-08
Docum your applicath thereof, your and policies. Your allegations of error and reviewed in accordance with administrative d procedures applicable to the proceedings of this ntary material considered by the Board consisted of on, together with all material submitted in support naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and conscientious consideration of the entire ard found that the evidence submitted was o establish the existence of probable material tice. In concluded that the DD...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09843-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval recoreé and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09848-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 21 November 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09851-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09861-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received a discharge under other than honorable conditions on 21 October 1977. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09866-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to waive recoupment of the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB); and to backdate advancement to paygrade E-5. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09873-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09878-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. You elected not to consult counsel, have your case heard before an administrative discharge board, and did not object to the administrative discharge action. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged for alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09890-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09896-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09898-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09901-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09902-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 December 2008...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09906-08
9906-08 12 May 2009 From: .Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09910-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ‘BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX . WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 9910-08 11 May 09 ——
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09911-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ruskin, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09918-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 20 June 2008 and her rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09922-08
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report for 27 January to 14 June 2007 by removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer’s comments), “Given a little more experience, I’m confident [you] will exceed all standards for quality results on the toughest of tasks.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. In this connection,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09927-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he meet the criteria for Special Leave Accrual. The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09931-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09932-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09937-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reinstatement to paygrade E-4 upon discharge from the Reserves and accession to active duty. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ruskin, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09941-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner submitted a request for an extension of the 180-day period in which to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense incident to his discharge of 1 March 2007...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09953-08
Ya en} & Bs DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ices DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Ruskin, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09961-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09966-08
panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2009. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (N134) dated 3 April 2009, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) (PERS-32) dated 7 May 2009, NPC (PERS-007) dated 10 June 2009 with enclosure and Nec (PERS-80) dated 7 October 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09967-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The 16 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 31 January 2008, is null and void.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09975-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09978-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. You were also counseled regarding this offense and warned that further infractions could result in disciplinary action or an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. On 8 January 1985, you had NJP for use of marijuana.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09980-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(TAR) vice USN.. 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Ruskin, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09988-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on i July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that a reentry code of RE-4 may be assigned to Sailors discharged by reason of erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09991-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2009. The Board found nothing objectionable in the reporting senior (RS)'’s use of the word “flippant” in section I (RS’s “Directed and Additional Comments”) of the contested fitness report. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09993-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09994-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09995-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(TAR) vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Ruskin, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09997-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10001-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in 1 record and applicable statutes, The Board was unable to obtain your the Department of Veterans Affairs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10003-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10007-08
The Board was unable to find you should have been put on recruiting probation before your relief as area staff noncommissioned officer in charge (ASNCOIC) since your relief was not based entirely on failure to make recruiting mission. The Board found it was a harmless error that the reporting senior (RS) mentioned the alleged failure to make mission in section C (“Billet Accomplishments”) of the fitness report. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10008-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10009-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10012-08
You requested, in effect, that the fitness report for 2 July to 30 September 2007 be modified, in accordance with the reporting senior’s (RS’s) letters dated 12 June and 8 September 2008 and the reviewing officer's (RO’s) letter dated 15 June 2008, by raising the mark in section D.2 (“Proficiency”) from “D” (fourth best of seven possible marks) to “E” (third best) and section E.2 (‘Effectiveness under Stress”) from “C” (fifth best) to “D.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10013-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10016-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. After appellate review, on 18 May 1990, you received the BCD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10020-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Indeed the Board believed considerable clemency was shown to you when authorities accepted your offer to waive a hearing if you received a general...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10022-08
Documentary material considered by the Boal your application, together with all material submi thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes and policies. You underwent psychiatric evaluation on 9 F and were given a diagnosis of an adjustment disord depressed mood and suicidal ideation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10027-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 March 2009 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6{e) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10028-08
The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Boyd and Washington, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10033-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...