Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09836-08
Original file (09836-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS

Docket No: 9836-08
25 November 2008

 

 

This is in re
your applicat
the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section
1552.

ference to your request for further consideration of
hon for correction of your naval record pursuant to

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

Records, sitt
application o
injustice wer
regulations a
Board. Docum

your applicath

thereof, your
and policies.

After careful
record, the B
insufficient

error or inju

submitted, wht

allegations o
Material evid

cCharacterizath

has been deni
will be furni

It is regrett
favorable act
Board reconsi
evidence or o

 

ing in executive session, considered your
25 November 2008. Your allegations of error and
reviewed in accordance with administrative
d procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
ntary material considered by the Board consisted of
on, together with all material submitted in support
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations

and conscientious consideration of the entire
ard found that the evidence submitted was
o establish the existence of probable material
tice. In concluded that the DD Form 149 you
ch contains no substantive information or
error or injustice, does not amount to new
nce or provide a basis for changing the
on of your service. Accordingly, your application

d. The names and votes of the members of the panel
hed upon request.

on cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
er its decision upon submission of new and material
ther matter not previously considered by the Board.

fo that the circumstances of your case are such that

In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

  

Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09710-07

    Original file (09710-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02085-08

    Original file (02085-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Boar of your application, support thereof, your naval record and applicable s regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of th record, the Board found that the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable error or injustice. On 26 January 1991, the Department of Affairs denied your request for service connection of an alleged mortar wound of the right leg/foot be together with all material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09831-07

    Original file (09831-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boar your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes and policies. In addition, the Board considered th the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 3 Octo copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08169-07

    Original file (08169-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    08169-0727 January 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14

    Original file (NR5583 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11629-08

    Original file (11629-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04621-09

    Original file (04621-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. On 25 August 2008, NAVADMIN 235/08 was published announcing that all reserve members thereafter mobilized in support of GWOT assignments would be issued orders under 10 USC 12302. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07508-07

    Original file (07508-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 19 March 1990 at age 25. on 3 April 1990 you were convicted by civil...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10022-08

    Original file (10022-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Boal your application, together with all material submi thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes and policies. You underwent psychiatric evaluation on 9 F and were given a diagnosis of an adjustment disord depressed mood and suicidal ideation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04645-09

    Original file (04645-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. On 25 August 2008, NAVADMIN 235/08 was published announcing that all reserve members thereafter mobilized in support of GWOT assignments would be issued orders under 10 USC 12302. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.