DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:
10022-08
26 November 2008
Dear pyie
This is in reference to your application for corre
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 1
States Code section 1552.
ection of your
0 of the United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered
application on 25 November 2008. Your allegations
injustice were reviewed in accordance with adminis
regulations and procedures applicable to the proce
Board. Documentary material considered by the Boal
your application, together with all material submi
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of t
record, the Board found that the evidence submitte
insufficient to establish the existence of probabl
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 2
2005. You underwent psychiatric evaluation on 9 F
and were given a diagnosis of an adjustment disord
depressed mood and suicidal ideation. On 6 April
discharged by reason of a condition, not a disabil
interfered with your performance of duty. You wer
reentry code of RE-4, as permitted by regulatory g
The Board concluded that you were properly assigne
code of RE-4. It is often assigned to Sailors dis
of a mental disorder, and especially in cases wher
evidence of suicidal ideation. The fact that you d
from an adjustment disorder at this time does not
your condition was misdiagnosed in 2006, or provid
changing your present reentry code. Accordingly,
application has been denied. The names and votes
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your cas
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitle
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of n
evidence or other matter not previously considered
your
of error and
trative
edings of this
rd consisted of
tted in support
regulations
i
he entire
d was
e material
2 September
ebruary 2006
er with
2006 you were
ity, that
e assigned a
uidance.
da reentry
charged because
e there is
o not suffer
Stablish that
a basis for
our
£ the members
are such that
to have the
w and material
by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
IDpaard
W. DEAN PFEIL
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07507-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06145-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2012. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned based on your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09297-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08385-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08817-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07178-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07705-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. At this time you were not recommended for retention or reenlistment, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code because of your failure to complete basic training due to your lack...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03522-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05189-08
Sincerely, LN a © W. DEAN PFEIFF Executive Dire Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5189-08 7 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In his application, Petitioner contends that he was misdiagnosed with a personality and adjustment disorder and that the Marine Corps made poor decisions based on his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00480-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2007. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to entry level performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.