Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09743-07
Original file (09743-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE :
Docket No. 09743-07
25 November 2008

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 November 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 May 2000. It
appears that your enlistment was fraudulent, in that you
concealed your disqualifying history of counseling and multiple
Suicide attempts when you applied for enlistment. You were
discharged by reason of physical disability on 23 December 2002,
without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the
Department of the Navy, due to disability which existed prior to
your enlistment and was not aggravated by your service.
The Board was not persuaded that you were unfit for duty by
reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated
by your period of naval service. In addition, it rejected your
unsubstantiated contentions to the effect that your record
contains false information concerning pre-service suicide
attempts and counseling, that you were not depressed before you
enlisted, and that you did not challenge the findings made in
your case because you were under duress at that time.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN SX ER

Executive Dir

~

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11251-07

    Original file (11251-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 June 1992. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03165-01

    Original file (03165-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2001. Although you were diagnosed a suffering from several mental disorder at that time, the only condition considered disabling was a psychotic disorder, not otherwise specified, which the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined existed prior to service (EPTS), and was not service aggravated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06481-07

    Original file (06481-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05030-07

    Original file (05030-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful andconscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 June 1974. You were discharged from the Navy by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04425-10

    Original file (04425-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 February 2011. You enlisted in the Navy on 21 September 2005. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01372-01

    Original file (01372-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 July 2001. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that the diagnosed made in your case and your discharge from the Marine Corps were erroneous, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability incurred in or aggravated by your service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09849-05

    Original file (09849-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    09849-05 11 September 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00187-07

    Original file (00187-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01659-10

    Original file (01659-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11, March 2010. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08410-08

    Original file (08410-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your haval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...