DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 09644-07
11 August 2008
Document
of your application,
ceedings of this
ary material cons; i
that you did not submit any new material
evidence Accordingly, the Board affirmed its previous
findings which are contained in
1997
would not have been entitled to disability separation or
retirement even if you had been unfit for duty, as your
discharge under other than honorable conditions would have taken
precedence over and precluded disability evaluation processing.
In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\gs ‘
W. DEAN
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09530-06
As you did not submit any new material evidence in support of your reconsideration request, the Board limited its review to your new request.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04112-10
As your request for upgrade of your bad conduct discharge was denied by the Board on 22 October 1997, and you have not submitted any new material evidence of error or injustice in connection with that discharge, the Board limited its review to your request for correction of your record to show that you were separated or retired by reason of physical disability. You were separated from the Navy on 5 June 1981 with a bad conduct discharge upon the completion of the appellate review of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05598-09
The Board did not reconsider your request for upgrade of your discharge because you did not submit any new material evidence jin support of that request. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval sitting in executive session, considered your new Your allegations of error and cordance with administrative licable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10210-07
On 11 September 2008, a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered only so much of your application as pertains to your request for disability separation. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04425-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 February 2011. You enlisted in the Navy on 21 September 2005. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03117-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2008. The Board did not reconsider your request for upgrade of your discharge because you did not submit any new material evidence or other matter that was not available in 2002 when the Board denied your original application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04386-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01189-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your receipt of substantial @isability ratings from the VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record because...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08273-07
08273-07 24 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08794-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...