DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 9620-07
5 September 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 September 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, a copy of which
is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application hag been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive Di ¢
Enclosure
From: Commander,
To: Executive Director,
Via: Assistant, Board for Correct
(Pers-31C)
subj: ADVISORY OPINION ICO MC1
Ref: (a) BCNR Docket Number 09620
1. In reference (a), the member add
would like to have corrected in his
file (OMPF). The first issue was t
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1000
PERS-312D1/06
6 JUN 2008
Navy Personnel Command
Board for Correction of Naval Records
ion of Naval Records
-O7
ressed two issues that he
official military personnel
D show his latest Armed
Forces Vocational Aptitude Battery Test (ASVAB) reflected in his
A
n unauthorized absence (UA)
entry for the period of 24 ~— 28 February 1994, removed from his
OMPF. The second issue was to have
OMPF.
2. In regards to the first issue, ad
the ASVAB test was administered to H
June 1995. The ASVAB printout that 4
reference (a) shows a date of 7 April
printout does not show any personal
the latest ASVAB date of 15 June 199
3. In regards to the second issue, t
that he was not UA in 1994. The eval
with reference (a) is an evaluation
official copy. He stated that he was
the ship, however; he provided no do
4. It is our opinion that the member
on file in his OMPF. It is also our
remove the UA document be denied.
cording to the member’s OMPF
im on 24 July 1991 and on 15
he member provided with
1 1992. However, this
identification. Regardless,
5S is on file in his OMPF.
he member failed to prove
ation report he provided
‘work sheet” and not the
attending a class onboard
rumentation.
js latest ASVAB scores are
opinion that the request to
ction
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005254
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show her revised Army Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test scores. The recruiter did say that he can accept a copy of her DA Form 2-1 or ERB showing her updated scores. She believes that it could already be updated on her DA Form 2-1 or ERB in her official military record and if so she would like a copy of it to present to recruiters and have the Board update the information in the appropriate systems so that she...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017169
The applicant requests the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 21 December 2006, for Recruiting Improprieties (RI) be found unsubstantiated and: a. removing the GOMOR from his official military personnel file (OMPF) or transferring to the restricted section of his OMPF; b. overturning the decision by the Standby Advisory Board (STAB), dated 10 December 2009, to remove him from the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Sergeant First Class (SFC) Promotion List; and c. retroactively...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04110-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02041-01
Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the record and 02 USMC He petitioned the porting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990731. requests removal of his failures of selection. Performance Evaluation Review Board He failed selection He petitioned the (PERB) for removal of the rting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990630. equests removal of his failures of selection. Head, Personnel Management Support was removed from the OMPF on 5 October emphatically states that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08458-00
1070 JAM4 1 1 JUN 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) APPLICATION We are asked to provide an opinion 1. for the removal from his service record book (SRB) and his official military personnel file (OMPF) of all entries related to his non-judicial punishment (NJP) of 17 June 1994. on Petitioner's request _.- We recommend that the requested relief be denied. Petitioner, however, his record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05189-08
Sincerely, LN a © W. DEAN PFEIFF Executive Dire Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5189-08 7 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In his application, Petitioner contends that he was misdiagnosed with a personality and adjustment disorder and that the Marine Corps made poor decisions based on his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07238-02
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with al material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulatio opinion furnished attached. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to robable material error or injustice. nlisted via the Accelerated Initial Accession the Advanced Pay Grade mporary e Army Reserve, vice Veteran e, however, e. she should have been accessed (OSVET) program or Prior Service her ASVAB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07980-08
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested fitness report. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your naval record will be corrected by removing the following fitness report: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report 16 January 2006 20050101 to 20051231 (AN) 2. By direction DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 1070 MIO SEP 8...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08343-98
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified the contested fitness report by changing the entry in item 5a from "NNNMED" (rifle. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 24 November 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08049-08
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (PERS - 311) dated 30 September 2008, with e-mail regarding PERS-311 contact with the reporting senior, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The member’s statement and the reporting senior’s endorsement to the fitness report are...