NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03450-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25 April 1989 at age 19. You received the BCD after appellate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03456-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03457-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 30 March 1987 at age 19. Prior to submitting this request for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03464-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 27 September 1979 at age 18. it also appears that when notified...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03469-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03470-07
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS . A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations 1956. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03478-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, The Board found that on 28 January 2005, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty by reason of bilateral knee conditions, each of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03487-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 21 August 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03496-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 13 September 1985 at age 19. Nevertheless, the Board found that these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03501-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2008. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that the reduction of the disability rating was erroneous, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03506-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 12 December 1986 after eight years of honorable service. You received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03507-07
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03510-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulation and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 2 March 1978 at age 19. Prior to submitting this request for discharge, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03513-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03519-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03535-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a National Call to Service (NCS) incentive bonus.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Ruskin, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03536-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 January 1983, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03545-07
3545-07 31 October 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Enlisted Supervisor Retention Pay (ESRP) Program.2. Shy, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03545-07
You requested that your corporal date of rank be adjusted from 24 February 2007 to 1 December 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03548-07
Further, there is nothing in your record to show that you were entitled to any personal decorations. Therefore, there is no basis to conclude that you served in the Marine Corps after 17 February 1967. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03550-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2008. It is clear that individuals who have been denied a security clearance cannot serve in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03551-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mann, Neuschafer, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03554-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 June 1989, the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03556-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a National Call to Service (NCS) incentive bonus.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Ruskin, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03564-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03567-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 20 January 1975, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 20. On 27 January 1976, your commanding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03579-07
3579-07 5 February 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03581-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJNDocket No: 0358l-0722 January 2008This is in reference to your application for correctionof your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code Section 1552.A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Naval Records sitting in execute session, considered your application on 16 January 2008, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03594-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5 100LCCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Rothlein, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 June...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03595-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner a former commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 vice the discharge with separation pay now of record. Instead of recommending Petitioner for an early retirement, his unit recommended him for Reserve Involuntary Separation Pay, based on 14 years of qualifying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03601-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and Conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 13 July 2005 at age 18. In this regard, the discharge authority directed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03604-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 5 Jun 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (c), members who initially entered active duty after 30 June 1985 and immediately enrolled in the MGIB Program, are eligible to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03618-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was unable to find the reporting senior never discussed with you, during the pertinent reporting period, your billet description or mission requirements. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03620-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 January 1974 after two years of prior...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03621-07
2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No:3621-07 9 May 2008 thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and 4 June 1974, for offenses that included unauthorized absence, failure to obey a lawful order, failure to go to appointed place: of duty, absence from appointed place of duty, disobedience, and an unspecified violation of a lawful regulation. you received a upgrading your discharge to honorable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03627-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2Q37O-51OOBJGDocket No:3627-0710 May 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report for 1 May to 6 July 2000 by removing section K (reviewing officer’s marks and comments)A three-member...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03632-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03633-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction o# Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. On 23 April 1991 you were convicted by SCM of a 34 day period of UA and sentenced to confinement for 30 days and a $501 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03634-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-blOOBJGDocket No:3634-0710 May 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval-record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the uncontested fitness report for 1 May to 25 October 2005 by removing section K (reviewing officer’s marks and comments).A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03643-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that those factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service ora change in the reason for discharge, given your lack of effort as well as the fact that your conduct and overall trait averages were insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03658-07
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 0321.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ivins, Ms. Guill, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03673-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03674-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 3674-07 25 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 9am Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired former member of the Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting that this record be corrected to show that he retired with 20 years...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03677-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, dated12 September 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The policy in effect states “The date entered is the day the Commanding Officer actually counsels the individual Marine.” It appears his commander directed the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03684-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 27 September 2005 you received your fourth NUP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when a Sailor is separated by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03688-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03703-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 months extension, vice a 8 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Mann, and Mr. Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 July 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03705-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During the period from 20 April to 3 September 1963 you were convicted by civil authorities of two counts of failure to appear in court for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03706-07
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted, and on 11 May 1973 you received an undesirable discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of your repetitive misconduct and lengthy periods of UA, which also resulted in your request for discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03710-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2008. Accordingly, you are requesting that your record be corrected to show that you retired with 20 years of active service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.