Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03548-07
Original file (03548-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG

Docket No: 3548-07
21 August 2008

 

 

Corps. Subsequently, a physical evaluation board concluded that
your discharge from the Marine Corps was warranted.
you retired from the Marine Corps in the grade of master gunnery
sergeant. As indicated, the record shows that you were honorable
discharged on 17 February 1967 in the grade of SSgt. Further,
there is nothing in your record to show that you were entitled to
any personal decorations. Given the passage of time, no other
records are available. A copy of the DD Form 214 prepared on 17
February 1967 is enclosed for your information.

then in effect and that your discharge from the Marine Corps was
proper. Further, the Board noted that a Federal Judge also
concluded that your discharge was proper. Therefore, there is no
basis to conclude that you served in the Marine Corps after 17

February 1967.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

 

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06282-00

    Original file (06282-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You continued to serve in the Marine Corps and whea you You were honorably discharged on During this period you Individuals discharged for unsuitability received the type of Character of service discharge warranted by the service record. The Board also noted your In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, subsequent honorable service in Vietnam in which you were twice wounded in combat, and your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03539-01

    Original file (03539-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You were again advanced to PFC and On 9 June 1969 you were The DD Form 214 shows that you had three periods of lost time, UA from 10 February to 10 March 1967 and two periods of confinement from 11 April to 12 June and 22 October to 21 December 1967. for entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal commenced on 26 October 1967, the day after your summary court-martial conviction. The DD Form 214 also indicates that eligibility Regulations provided that individuals discharged for the convenience of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06263-01

    Original file (06263-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 2 March 1975 Your military record shows that you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court- martial for the foregoing period of absence of about seven years. The Board concluded that your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5616 13

    Original file (NR5616 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted ‘in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when you were discharged at your request rather than being...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00279-99

    Original file (00279-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequently, you served in Vietnam from 13 March During this period, on 16 May 1968, you During the next 11 months you received Your offenses were The court sentenced you to reduction to pay grade E-l, On 29 September 1969 you were convicted by a special martial of two periods of unauthorized absence totaling about 124 days. found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your multiple The Board noted and lengthy periods of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06696-02

    Original file (06696-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the enlisted performance board initially recommended discharge, this decision was changed after you submitted evidence that you had met the weight standards. The fitness report for the period 13 September 1986 to 14 February 1987 states as follows:(He) is leaving the Marine Corps after nineteen years of dedicated service, including an extended tour in the Republic of Vietnam. Consequently, the Board concluded that a correction to your record to show that you retired from the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10683-07

    Original file (10683-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 19 January 1966, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 20. On 19 July 1966, you began an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05181-01

    Original file (05181-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04275-02

    Original file (04275-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that you were issued a clemency 1970's and not an honorable discharge as you The Board believed that considerable clemency was extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by this action, Further, of confinement at hard...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08326-07

    Original file (08326-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 10 January 1967 at age 17. On 23 August 1969 you began another...