2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:3621-07
9 May 2008
thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations
and 4 June 1974, for offenses that included unauthorized absence,
failure to obey a lawful order, failure to go to appointed place:
of duty, absence from appointed place of duty, disobedience, and
an unspecified violation of a lawful regulation. you received a
upgrading your discharge to honorable. You received a general
discharge because your conduct and overall trait averages (OTA)
were 2.35 and 2.63, respectively. At that time, minimum averages
of 3.0 in conduct and 2.7 in OTA were required for an honorable
discharge. Accordingly, and as you have not demonstrated that it
would be in the interest of justice to upgrade your discharge as
an exception to policy, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
dP ramtrhel
W. DEAN PFET
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6741 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2015. On 13 November 1995, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) upgraded the characterization of your discharge to general under honorable conditions based on your post service eonduct . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11259-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An average of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06912-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 December 1976, you received a general discharge based on your average conduct marks. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01598-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The punishment imposed was forfeitures totalling Your record further reflects that on 19 March 1976 you received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09553-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were not recommended for retention or reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01479 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07783-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 7 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 31 December Your record reflects that during the 1964 at the age of 17. period from 4 June to 23 October 1965 you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12563 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, during the period from 11 July to 6 September 1973, you received three more NUPs for a one day period of unauthorized absence (UA),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05234-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02437-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. Consequently,...