This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code section 1552,
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 3643-07
5 May 2008
application for correction of your
provisions of title 10 of the United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 April 2008.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the
error or injustice.
existence of probable material
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 October 1980.
On 30 July 1981 your commanding officer stated that you had
failed to maintain proficiency in rate and that your performance
was non-contributory to unit readiness. You received a general
discharge by reason of convenience of the government on 7 August
1981. You did not object to the discharge.
Character of service is based,
in part, on one’s conduct and
overall trait averages, both of which are computed from marks
assigned during periodic evaluations. Your conduct and overall
trait averages were 2.80 and 2.41, respectively. aA minimum
average conduct mark of 3.0 and 2.7 in overall trait average were
required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the
time of separation.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, good service,
and the contention that you were struck in the back and pushed by
an officer. The Board concluded that those factors were
insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service ora
change in the reason for discharge, given your lack of effort as
well as the fact that your conduct and overall trait averages
were insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable discharge.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10872-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 27 September 1979, you enlisted in the Naval Reserve at age 18 and began a period of active service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10872-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2008. Characterization of service is determined by a service member's conduct, actions, performance and marks assigned on a periodic basis. Given your NUP's and failure to attain the behavior mark average required for a fully honorable characterization of service, the Board found that your period of active service warranted a general characterization of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00870-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05262-07
Correction of Naval considered your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, application on 15 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04269-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 10 October 1979 at age 19. Your conduct marks average was 2.7. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05437-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05636-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00675-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your general discharge given your record of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05555-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and overall traits averages, both of which are computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05067-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 June 1979. A minimum average conduct mark of...