. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
. BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
. 2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 3470-07
9 May 2008
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
1956. On 19 April 1956 an Aptitude Board found you to be poorly
motivated, unable to adjust, and emotionally inadequate. On 25
April 1956 you received a general discharge by reason of
unsuitability.
underwater training. The Board concluded that the mitigating
factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
service. It could not find any evidence in the available records
which even Suggests that you were unfit for service by reason of
physical disability, rather than unsuitable for service.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Los SYaoun!
W. DEAN P FRR
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00589-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 May 1954 at age 18. You were issued a general discharge on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04911-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your brief period of service, and your inability or unwillingness to fulfill the requirements of recruit training. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12233-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2011. On 13 June 1956, you received a general discharge due to unsuitability (personality disorder), and were not recommended for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03313-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 31 August 1954 you received NJP for failure to The punishment imposed was The punishment imposed was 14 days of that On 14 September 1954, you were convicted by summary martial of breaking restriction. convicted of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03530-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement During the period from 1 to 13 March 1956 you were convicted by civil authorities of failure to appear, two day period of UA. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05477-02
3 A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2003. In March 1962, during an investigation into the allegations of fraudulent enlistment, (CT) Camerino submitted a letter which stated that she was your wife because the two of you were married on 27 August 1956, and had children. At that time, you denied being married to (SS) Camerino.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02104-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. A special court-martial convened on 9 August 1956 and convicted you of the foregoing period of unauthorized absence of about 76 The court days and missing ship's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00058-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2010. On 3 February 1956, you were convicted by general court martial (GCM) of assault with a dangerous weapon, insubordinate conduct toward a noncommissioned officer, threatening to kill and failure to obey a lawful order. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09319-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. While UA, you were convicted in civil court for assault and robbery. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02892-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 23 November 1956 an ADB recommended an undesirable discharge by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction. On 11 December 1956 the discharge authority approved these recommendations and directed an undesirable discharge, and on 4 January 1957, while in the custody of civil...