NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03680-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 21 August 2002 to 17 January 2003 (copy in enclosure (1) at Tab A) and the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry dated 16 February 2003 (copy in enclosure (1) at Tab B).2. In enclosure (4), the HQMC Manpower Information Operations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03682-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 19 April 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03687-06
3687-0625 Oct 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03691-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board fo d the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 16 May 2002 at age 18 and served without disciplinary incident.On 3 June...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03693-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-Si 00JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03695-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (b) authorized petitioner to recall FTS in the PN rate via reenlistment. The petitioner requests to receive the FTS SRB payment based on the reenlistment of 26 July 2005.3.The petitioner is ineligible for the zone “A” FTS SHE entitlement because the member is on a first-term active Navy enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03705-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies s.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlist d in the Naval Reserve on 28 February 1985 and began a period of active duty on 17...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03722-06
3722-06 1 Nov 06 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Former Private XXXX was a Sergeant and she was authorized 4 days of proceed when transferred, took 3 days for travel time, and used 20 days of leave before she reported to her new duty assignment on 990428 per the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03723-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval r cord, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 6 July 1984 at age 19. On 31 May 1985 an ADB recommended an other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03730-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code be changed.2. The Boa d, consisting of Mr. Ms. and Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error andinjustice o 28 November 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available e evidence of record. As such, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03742-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUt4ED letter 7220 Ser Ml/O5UMl-50l8 of 10 January 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03745-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Your late husband enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 14 December 1942 at the age of 17. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03746-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered your rebuttal letter dated 28 July 2006 with enclosure.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03755-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve and began a period of active duty on 27 January 1983. However, 364...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03765-06
The Board~ consisting of Messrs. Neuschefer, Washington and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioners allegations of error and injustice on 5 October 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They specifically recommended that his captain date of rank (and by implication, effective date)be adjusted to 1 July 2006.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03769-06
03769-06 14 May 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 May 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03777-06
03777-06 8 June 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03784-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. -In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03797-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 15 August 1963 after three years of prior honorable service and served...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03803-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 30 September 1977 at age 19. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03815-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Members CONSUBPAY stopped upon transfer for not meeting the requirements of Ref(a).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03820-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03826-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03832-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAR) at the with-dependent rate for Washington, DC.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations oferror and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03838-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03848-06
You now request that this section K be modified, in accordance with the RO’s letter dated 15 February 2006, to reflect that the RO had “insufficient” observation to assess your performance.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2007. The petitioner offers an advocacy letter from the reviewing officer which requests that the report now be marked “insufficient observation” vice “sufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03856-06
The Navy Personnel Command (NPC) has administratively removed from Petitioner’ s naval record all reference to the NJP, except the contested statement in his fitness report. d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), PERS-3 11, the NPC office having cognizance over fitness reports, has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request should be denied, as the NJP was properly documented in his fitness report when it was imposed, and the set aside action took place about two years and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03863-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03868-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, pertinent naval records and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03878-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 6 February 1980. The Board concluded that those...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03883-06
You that you suffered from posttraumatic stress ~red you unfit for further service and warrantedof the Board for Correction of Naval Records, session, considered your application on 21 June ns of error and injustice were reviewed in administrative regulations and procedures applicable this Board. Documentary material considered• of your application, together with all material iereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, policies.conscientious consideration of the entire record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03884-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 November 2004 to 29 June 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, leaving in the record the report for 16 November 2004 to 1 July 2005, a copy of which is atTabB.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hess, Lippolis and Swarens, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03912-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 13 January 1982 at age 19. The punishment imposed was a $200...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03915-06
Petitioner then moved to Knoxville, TN and finished his processing for enlisting in the US Navy for active duty. Enclosure (3)d. On the date individuals are enlisted for active duty they are given the opportunity to update the information that was given on the date they enlisted into the DEP. 3915-06Accordingly, the Board recommends the following corrective action.RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03925-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100BJGDocket No:3925-067 September 2006Dear SergeantThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested, in effect, that the fitness reports for 21 May 2002 to 14 April 2003 and 31 May 2003 to 19 March 2004 be modified by deleting from section I (“Directed and Additional Comments”)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03926-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03934-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 27 April 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03943-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board found that although you were diagnosed as suffering from a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03967-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify BUPERS enlisted orders.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03979-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the HM(8432) rate/NEC.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Haney, Mr Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03993-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NRC memorandum 1133 Ser N53l2/0905l of 9 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04000-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 13 May 1977. You were discharged by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04006-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injusticeYou enlisted ~i he Na on 6 August 1998 at age 24. On 29 December 1999, only six days after the NJP,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04014-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. XXXX service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3F was correctly assigned The reenlistment code was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04049-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) from his enlistment documents.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Ballinger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04075-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed.2 The Board consisting of Messrs and reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 November 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04091-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 10 July 1997 at age 19. Subsequently, on 5 August 1997 you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04092-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 21 October 1983. After review by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04095-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04111-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...