Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03765-06
Original file (03765-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203705100

 HD: hd
Docket No. 03765-06
5 October 2006
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
         
Subj:   _____
 REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref:     (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 dtd I May 06 w/ attachments
(2)      PERS-480 memo dtd7 Jun 06
 (3)      Subject ‘S naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of captain he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 06 Reserve Line Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 07 Reserve Line Captain Selection Board. He currently holds a 1 October 2006 captain date of rank and effective date.
2.       The Board~ consisting of Messrs. Neuschefer, Washington and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioners allegations of error and injustice on 5 October 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented to the effect that his request has merit and warrants favorable action. They specifically recommended that his captain date of rank (and by implication, effective date) be adjusted to 1 July 2006.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION.
a.       That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show his date of rank and effective date in the grade of captain as 1 July 2006, vice 1 October 2006; and that his lineal precedence be adjusted accordingly.
b.       That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c.       That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an appropriate location in Petitioner’s naval record, and that another copy of this report be returned to this Board, together with any material directed to be removed from Petitioner’s record, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 7 23.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
                   ~
 ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
 Recorder         Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09138-06

    Original file (09138-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Exnicios and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’ s allegations of error and injustice on 14 December 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They specifically recommended that his lieutenant commander date of rank (and by implication, effective date) be adjusted to 1 October 2005.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06714-06

    Original file (06714-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 04 Line Commander Selection Board, vice the FY 07 Line Commander Selection Board. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05951-06

    Original file (05951-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2007 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board.2. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02007-06

    Original file (02007-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 CWO3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2006 CWO3 Selection Board. They specifically...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08256-00

    Original file (08256-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank and effective date in the grade of captain she would have been assigned had she been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Staff Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 01 Staff Captain Selection Board. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06915-06

    Original file (06915-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2007 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02108-06

    Original file (02108-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Reserve Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2007 Reserve Colonel Selection Board. Enclosure (5)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05855-01

    Original file (05855-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 01 Active Duty Line Commander Selection Board, vice the FY 02 Active Duty Line Commander Selection Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06256-10

    Original file (06256-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 10 Line Commander Selection Board, vice the FY 11 Line Commander Selection Board. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09420-02

    Original file (09420-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor, Tew and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 December 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Cap Captain Select Performance Evaluation Review Board Transfer fitness report from 990908 to 991113. subsequently selected for promotion USMC Captain Selection Board. and following the removal Capta he was selected for...