Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04075-06
Original file (04075-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370
-5100

                                             TJR
                                                                                          Docket No:4075-06
                                                                                         
1 November 2006


From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Sub               RECORD __


Ref:     (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2)      Case summary
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed.

2 The Board consisting of Messrs and reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 November 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in a timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

c.       Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 October 1952 at the age of 19.

d.       Petitioner served without incident until 25 May 1953, when he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for possession of a rusty rifle.
e.       On 28 July 1953 a medical board found Petitioner to be unfit for further service due to a diagnoses of immaturity with symptomatic habit reaction, and enuresis.

f.       On 28 August 1953 Petitioner was issued a general discharge under honorable conditions. At that time, his conduct average of 3.98 was below the average mark of 4.0 required for a fully honorable characterization of service.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action based on the minor nature of his misconduct and overall record of service and conduct average, which was only .02 under the requirement for a fully honorable characterization of service.

Based on the foregoing, the Board concludes that no useful purpose is served by continuing to characterize Petitioner’s service as having been under honorable conditions, and recharacterization to a fully honorable discharge is appropriate. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form of recharacterization of Petitioner’s discharge is appropriate.

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECONMENDATION:

a.       That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was issued an honorable discharge on 28 August 1953 vice the general discharge actually issued on that same day.

b.       That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed, or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c.       That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.






2



4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedin g the led matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN                                    WILLIAM J. HESS, IIII
Recorder         Acting Recorder


5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



W.      
DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Dir ector

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11354-07

    Original file (11354-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUJR Docket No: 11354-07 19 November 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Wi Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board especially notes that Petitioner's conduct and proficiency averages met the requirements for a fully honorable characterization of service. c. That, upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be informed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06278-10

    Original file (06278-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a Former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge of 28 October 1993 be changed. On 19 October 1993 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted by the service record. The Board's finding is based on his length of service and periodic conduct marks.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2714-13

    Original file (NR2714-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the other than honorable (OTH} characterization of his discharge on 9 April 1954 be changed. He stated in part, that the automobile accident was intentional, he wanted to kill himself and get away from the Marine Corps.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01582-01

    Original file (01582-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the separation under honorable conditions and the subsequent general discharge. A retired Marine colonel states that Petitioner is a good citizen and he believes an injustice was done in this case. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01801-05

    Original file (01801-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr., Mr.and Mr., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show he was separated with an honorable discharge on 3 August 1954 and that he was recommended for reenlistment, vice the under honorable conditions discharge and the non-recommendation for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06091-10

    Original file (06091-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gattis, Spain, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. titioner served without disciplinary incident and that his unsatisfactory performance was based solely on his failure to meet physical fitness standards. The Board notes that Pe Board concludes that no useful...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04329-11

    Original file (04329-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge of 20 January 1952 be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dixit, Mr. Pfeiffer and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01854-99

    Original file (01854-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1854-99 12 August 1999 From: To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy/Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03161-09

    Original file (03161-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member°of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge on 24, March 1972 be changed. On 21 March 1972 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted by the service record. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09414-08

    Original file (09414-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material , considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the foregoing the Board concludes that no useful purpose is served by continuing to characterize Petitioner's service as having been under honorable conditions, and recharacterization to a fully honorable discharge js appropriate. The Board further concludes that Petitioner was properly diagnosed with a personality disorder that existed...