NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04143-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board retesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the other than honorable discharge issued on 13 October 1992.2 The Board, consisting of Mr Mr and Ms reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 July 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04154-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04203-06
1152Encl: (1) Case Summary(2)Subject’ s naval record1 Pursuant to the provisions of reference Petitioner, an former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting a better Characterization of service than the discharge under other than honorable conditions now of record.2. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 6 August 1990 he was issued a general discharge by reason of misconduct vice the discharge under other than honorable conditions...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04211-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 13 March 2003. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04213-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 20 September 1989. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04215-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 February 1991 at age 19 and served for a year and six months without...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04222-06
TJRDocket No: 4222-06 15 February 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04232-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 4 September 2001 and served for more than three years without disciplinary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04235-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve and began a period of active duty on 9 September 1975 at age 17. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04237-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 December 1998 at age 30. Accordingly, i have determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04239-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with an award level of 0.5 for the PN rating. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04247-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TJR Docket No: 4247-06 16 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his discharge be upgraded and his reenlistment code and narrative reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04253-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish -entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.3. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04259-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2037-0-5100TJRDocket No: 4259-0616 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of her discharge and changes in the narrative reason for separation and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04262-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 July 2006, a copy of which is attached, and your rebuttal.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. For the remainder of relief requested Applicant fails to provide substantial evidence of probable material error or injustice. After...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04265-06
04265-06 2 July 2007DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 June 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04271-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected show entitlement to Board Certification Pay(BCP).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04272-06
Chief Petty Officer XXXX was selected to Senior Chief Petty Officer with an effective date of 16 December 1998.b. BCNR ltr LCC:ddj Docket No: 9653-02 of 1 April 2003, directed Chief retroactive advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer be effective since there was no advisory indicating he was not in an eligible status to be advanced on that date. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF HMCM Per reference (c), Chief XXXX new Time in Rate established his first eligibility for consideration to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04281-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEAN PFEFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYCHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNELWASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5000IN...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04288-06
In the alternative, you requested that your captain date of rank and effective date be adjusted from 1 September 1990 to 1 December 1989, to reflect selection by the FY 1990 Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 1991 Captain Selection Board, as your redesignation as an unrestricted officer came too late for you to be considered in the promotion zone by the earlier promotion board. Applicant was selected for redesignation for unrestricted officer as announced in reference (c) . The FY91 USMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04289-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04290-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner: filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show (a) that Petitioner did not have a break in service when she was discharged from the Marine Corps and enlisted in the Navy, (b) that Petitioner attended Officer Candidate School (005) in paygrade E—6 vice E—5, (c) that Petitioner is entitled to payment of Dislocation Allowance (DLA) and (d)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04298-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100LCCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of $6,812.45 for Commercial Meal Rates (CMR), which were authorized during the period of his Temporary Additional Duty (TAD), 2 March through 30...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04300-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2. Petitioner asserts that he no longer has the ankle problems for which is was administrative separated and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Recruiting personnel are responsible for determining whether an individual meets the standards for reenlistment, and whether or not a request for a waiver of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04308-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 4 December 1953 at age 18. About six months later, on 23 June...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04319-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and Conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 September 1987 at age 18. The punishment imposed was a $500 forfeiture...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04327-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration, of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 29 December 1997 at age 20. About six months later, on 29 June 2001, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04328-06
to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04330-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 26 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04337-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dietrich, and Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04346-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the Petitioner’s record and data files reflect an extended EAOS of 14 November 2007.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Haney, Mr Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04359-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04364-06
On 3 October 2005, the Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards (SECNAVCORB) determined that the condition of Petitioner’s cervical spine should have been rated at 20% under VA code 5237, based on the limitation of motion in that spinal segment, and that the mental disorder was not unfitting. CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concurs with the finding of the informal panel of the PEB that the condition of Petitioner’s lumbar...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04375-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 16 January 1984 at age 18. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04405-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its proceedings, the PERB concluded that the report is administratively correct and procedurally complete with one minor error, the reporting senior made an adverse comment in section “C” of the report. The Board found that the reviewing officer concurred and addressed the allegation of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04420-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 February 1999 at age 20. on 18 January 2000 you were counseled regarding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04427-06
In order to enroll in MGIB, service members are required to contribute a total of $1,200 into the MGIB program (usually $100.00 per month for the first 12 months)d. On 13 February 1997, Petitioner signed the DD Form 2366 Montgomery GI Bill Statement of Disenrollment (enclosure (3)), however, he did not sign the Statement of Understanding indicating that he understood he was eligible for the MGIB Program enrollment. Petitioner requests that his naval record be corrected to show that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04444-07
Under that formulaSUBJ: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO most officers promoted approximately one year after graduation from law school, but there were frequent anomalies.The new implementing instruction, OPNAVINST 1120.11 signed on 29 December 2005, awards constructive service credit upon commencement of active duty at Naval Justice School. Additionally, the FY07 accession year group all have been treated similarly: they are all subject to the promotion guidelines of the new...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04466-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 15 June and 11 July 2006, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04468-06
04468-06 2 November 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04470-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BNP memo 5730 Pers-4011 dtd 27 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04477-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable mate ial error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 October 1998 at age 21. You then served without incident until 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04483-06
1552Encl: (I) IDU Form l’19 w/attachments(2) CNEC memo 1133 5cr N32 of 6 Aug 07 (3) Subject’s naval record1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit(EBCC)2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Ballinger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04508-06
At the time of his enlistment in the DEP, Petitioner had completed three years of college.d. Additional documents executed on that same date included a Navy College Assistance Student Headstart (CASH) Program service agreement that established 20 February 2002 as Petitioner’s projected ship date for recruit training; a Navy CASH Program letter of responsibility to Petitioner; and active duty orders that directed Petitioner to serve in the Navy CASH Program during a four month course of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04517-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to a zone “C” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UTC 0763A. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04520-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 8 June 1984 after six years of prior active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04521-06
4521-06 4 October 2006 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and cancel an extension agreement. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04531-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04546-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an extension agreement. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04559-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dunn, Mr. Novello, and Ms. Mann reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 November 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...