DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SRB
Docket No. 3820-06
4 Oct 06
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
3 October 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers
675 of 30 June 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Executive Dire
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1780
PERS-675
30 Jun 06
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C)
Subj: ses -OMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
Ref: (a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS- 31c ot 26 Jun 06
(b) Title 38, United States (Code, Chapter 30
1. The following is provided in response to reference (a).
Recommend denial of¢g pense: cegquest to enroll in the
Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) PFogram. Since Tip. Sid not
provide substantial evidence to support his claim of
misinformation, there is insufficient reason to recommend
approval of his request. A review of WM“ master digital
record indicates he disenrolled from the MGTB Program on
12 July 1991. Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll is
irrevocable.
2. PI who can be reached
at
A. T. SCHMITT
Head, GI Bill Programs Section
(PERS-675G)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00033-06
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00764-06
764-06 10 May 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00515-06
After carefu and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board fo nd that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish th existence of probable material error or injustice. MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll is irrevocable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04694-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (d), an individual who was a VEAP participant on or before 9 October 1996 and served continuously from that date through at least 1 April 2000 was allowed an opportunity to convert from VEAP to the MGIB Program. For veterans and members like de Wh entered during VEAP era and were not eligible for MGIB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00383-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (b), an individual who was a Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) participant on or before 9 October 1996 and served continuously from that date through at least 1 April 2000 was allowed an opportunity to convert from VEAP to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program. We had other cases of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09043-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (b), the Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) was available to members who entered the military for the first time between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06502-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend denial 0 fannie: request to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06715-06
6715-06 4 Oct 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (b)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00759-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.SincerelyW. He had from the time he completed the DD Form 2057 until Congress closed VEAP to new enrollments for the last time on 31 March 1987 to start an allotment and become a participant. Although we believe all who have served on active duty deserve quality education benefits, allowing those who didn’t participate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04427-06
In order to enroll in MGIB, service members are required to contribute a total of $1,200 into the MGIB program (usually $100.00 per month for the first 12 months)d. On 13 February 1997, Petitioner signed the DD Form 2366 Montgomery GI Bill Statement of Disenrollment (enclosure (3)), however, he did not sign the Statement of Understanding indicating that he understood he was eligible for the MGIB Program enrollment. Petitioner requests that his naval record be corrected to show that he...