NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01170-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 24 January 1996. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01172-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 23 May 1972 at age 18. On 19 September 1973 you were again...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01178-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 30 March 1982 after nearly five years of honorable service. On 4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01244-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner reenlisted on 9 October 2005 and was authorized payment of Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Haney, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01255-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00HD:hd Docket No. From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U,SAY 1552 End: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 9 Feb 06 (2) PERS—676 memo dtd 17 Apr 06 w/enclosure (3) Memo for Record dtd 3 May 06 (4) Subject’s naval record 1.Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01268-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error o~ injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 18 October 1985 at age 30. On 10 December 1986 the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01279-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01309-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IS(3912) rating/NEC. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01342-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the EN rating. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01343-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01349-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NPC memorandum 1920, Ser 4834/031, 21 Jun 06 and NPC letter, 5420 POOJ6/1l3, 19 October 2006, a copy of each is attached. Members advanced under these procedures must be serving, in temporary officer status on the date enlisted advancement is effected.6. Accordingly,met both requirements in Aug 04, and his advancement to E—8 would have been effective 1 Jul 04.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01358-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) former spouse coverage.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew and Ms. Countryman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01381-06
As indicated in the enclosed letter dated 2 February 2006, your case was administratively closed, pending exhaustion of the administrative remedy of submitting your request for release from active duty directly to the Secretary of the Navy. Accordingly, your case was reopened.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2006. The Board also considered your counsel’s letters dated 26 January 2006...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01381-07
Your contention that you did not play any “kind of ball” before you enlisted is contradicted by entries in your naval record and not probative of the existence of probable material error or injustice in your record. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your condition was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01382-06
01382-0628 February 2006-This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested that your minimum service obligation be reduced from eight to seven years, or that you be released from active duty effective February 2006. As indicated in the enclosed letter dated 2 February 2006, your case was administratively closed, pending exhaustion of the administrative remedy of submitting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01383-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error an injustice on 22 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01384-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01391-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01399-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Na , filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 12 April 2004.2. The Board, consisting of Mr., Mr., and Ms. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error andinjustice on 4 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01407-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “B’ Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ABE rating. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01414-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 22 June to 30 September 2002 to show a section K.3 (reviewing officer’s comparative assessment”) mark of fourth best of eight possible marks, vice fifth best. As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01416-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 2 November 1972 at age 19. However, during the period from 2 January 1974...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01423-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 10 February 2006, a copy of which is attached. Therefore, we are returning the petitioner’s request without any action being taken.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01428-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Therefore, we are returning the petitioner’s request without any action being taken.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01455-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 CRS D ocket No:1455—0618 October 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01459-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 January 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01469-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 10 May 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01490-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 14 February 1995 for four years, and then served in an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01492-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 PER5-4823, 4 April 2006, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01496-06
You further impliedly requested removing all documentation of your nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 22 June 2005 and the vacation of suspension of your reduction to pay grade E-4 on 19 August 2005.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consideredyour application on 7 December 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01497-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a change in the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 19 September 2003. g. Enclosure (2) to reference (b) states that an individual who is released from active duty and not recommended for retention must be assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01519-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messr, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice March 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01522-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 10 July 1969 after three years of prior...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01523-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01535-06
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Per reference (a) , Sergeant requests a correction to his DD Form 214, effective 25 January 2000 through 24 January 2004, to reflect the rank of sergeant (E-5) vice corporal (F-A) 2. A review record verifies he was promoted to corporal on 1 January 2003.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01550-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N13OE/06U0493, 5 September 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYOFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000 7220 Ser...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01561-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the information currently contained in your record it appears you served for four years without incident and were advanced to paygrade E-4. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01574-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 March 1972 at age 17. On 17 July 1973, you received a fourth...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01585-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 February 1985 at age 20. you completed initial training and on 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01596-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 May 1972 at age 17. You served without incident for over two years...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01604-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner re-enlisted on 17 December 2005.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew and Ms. Countryman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01606-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 April 1979 at age 17 and served for 10 months without...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01610-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 20 March 1984 at age 19. Further, the Board noted that you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01613-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SRB Docket No: 1613-06 27 Sep 06 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01615-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 21 December 1984 after two years of prior honorable service. Because...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01621-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 7 April 1986 after seven years of prior honorable service. On 7 July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01622-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 15 June 1942 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident until 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01630-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 9 March 1984 at age 18 and began a period of active duty on 22 March 1984....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01666-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulatjo~ 5 and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 5 October 1979 at age 18, and subsequently extended your enlistment for 12...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01674-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. PERS-4822 15 Apr 06 MEMORANDLTM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-31C Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject’s case.