NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05704-06
You requested, in effect, that your naval record be corrected to show you did not decline promotion to lieutenant commander with a date of rank and effective date of 1 July 2005, but accepted it, and that your retirement on 1 October 2005 was in the grade of lieutenant commander.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on l4December2006. Officers who have accepted appointment to the next higher grade must...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09684-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1811 PER5-4822, 18 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00472-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject’s case. Member is not entitled to active duty credit for her time spent at the USNA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02060-06
2060-0613 October 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 4 October 2006. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06555-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 31 August 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10071-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner contacted Retired Operations Section (N-152), enclosure (2), requesting clarification on retired status. Per enclosure (4) advancement on the retired list to the grade of CWO2 would result in a loss of pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02558-06
2558-06 9 May 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00383-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (b), an individual who was a Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) participant on or before 9 October 1996 and served continuously from that date through at least 1 April 2000 was allowed an opportunity to convert from VEAP to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program. We had other cases of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01349-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NPC memorandum 1920, Ser 4834/031, 21 Jun 06 and NPC letter, 5420 POOJ6/1l3, 19 October 2006, a copy of each is attached. Members advanced under these procedures must be serving, in temporary officer status on the date enlisted advancement is effected.6. Accordingly,met both requirements in Aug 04, and his advancement to E—8 would have been effective 1 Jul 04.