Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01490-07
Original file (01490-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                    2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                             TRG
         Docket No: 1490-07
         6 September 2007




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 14 February 1995 for four years, and then served in an excellent manner for almost four years. On 17 December 1998, you were transferred from Hawaii to California for separation processing. Subsequently, you consented to an early release from active duty and acknowledged that entitlement to pay and allowances and credit for active federal service ended on the date of release from active duty. You were released from active duty on 22 December 1998. At that time, you had completed 3 years, 10 months and 9 days of active service.
Regulations allow for an early release from active duty or expiration of enlistment for the convenience of the government up to 90 days early. Since you consented to early release and have been treated no differently than thousands of other, the Board could not find an error or injustice in your early release from the Marine Corps.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.


It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01490-07

    Original file (01490-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 14 February 1995 for four years, and then served in an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08324-07

    Original file (08324-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your “application on 22 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were released from active duty on 26 November 1997 with your service characterized as honorable.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10044-06

    Original file (10044-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2007. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regarding your contentions, amnesty is not applicable in your case, and even though you were a sole surviving son, you voluntarily enlisted at the age of 17 with parental consent. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07468-10

    Original file (07468-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. In its review of your application the Board concluded that in view of your repeated acts of misconduct as well as your apparent willingness to accept an OTH in order to gain an early release from the Marine Corps your discharge was properly issued and should not be changed now as a matter of clemency. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07783-06

    Original file (07783-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 30 May 1975 at age 17 with parental consent. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00343-06

    Original file (00343-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03634-06

    Original file (03634-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2007. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11037-08

    Original file (11037-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result of that rating action, your case was referred to the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery for review. After being advised of the options available.to you, you elected to request transfer to the Retired List of the Marine Corps Reserve with entitlement to retired pay at age 60. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07215 12

    Original file (07215 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06057-00

    Original file (06057-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The report stated that you were not -- On 22 April 1992 you were convicted by special court-martial of use of marijuana in February apparently based on the...