Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01550-06
Original file (01550-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 LCC
Docket No. 1550-06
26 Sep 06



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N13OE/06U0493, 5 September 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.



Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000


 7220
Ser N13OE/06U0493
5 Sep 06
MEMOPANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS

 Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
Subj:    REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
Ref:     (a) Joint Federal Travel R egulations, Volume I

 Enc:     (1) BCNP. Case File #01550—06

 1.       Per your request, the following recommendation concerning enclosure (1) is provided.

2.       Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA), and Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) for Yokosuka, Japan for the period of 28 Jul 05 to 8 Oct
 05.

 2 A review~ of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner reported on board the USS SAN FRANCISCO (SSN 711) on 14 Nov 03. 1 Aug 05 the USS SAN FRANCISCO did a Change of Homeport (COH) from Agana, Guam to Bremerton, WA. The petitioner’s dependents departed Guam on 28 Jul 05 for Yokosuka, Japan. where the petitioner’s dependents resided until 8 Oct 05. IAW reference (a), a member is entitled to draw station allowances at dependent location of serving on unusually arduous sea duty and member has a designated place of residency authorized under paragraph U5222-D2. Appendix A of reference (a), states to receive allowances associated with a designated place move, the member must certify that the designated place is the place at which the dependent intend to establish a bona fide residence. The petitioner’s dependent went to Yokosuka, JA on a temporary basis as his spouse awaited entry approval to the United States.

 4.       N13OE recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request for retroactive payment of OHA and COLA as the petitioner does not meet the criteria of reference (a).





 For Official Use Only - Privacy Sensitive - Any misuse or unauthorized disclosure may result in both civil and criminal penalties.




 Subj:    REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO





        
Head, Travel and
Transportation Branch (N13OE)










































For Official Use Only - Privacy Sensitive - Any misuse or unauthorized disclosure may result in both civil and criminal penalties.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05709-06

    Original file (05709-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/06U0462, 21 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01516-07

    Original file (01516-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser Nl30C4/07U0247, 19 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06432-06

    Original file (06432-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. IAW reference (a), BAH entitlement is based on the member ‘s Permanent Duty Station (PDS)- Reference (b) allows...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01042-07

    Original file (01042-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner’s Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders were modified to show government air authorized.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, Boyd, and J. Hicks, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08239-06

    Original file (08239-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8239-06 1 Nov 06Dear Petty Officer:This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11083-06

    Original file (11083-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/07U0069, 25 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08277-06

    Original file (08277-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8277-06 1 Nov 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01820-07

    Original file (01820-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C4/07U0250, 20 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11207-08

    Original file (11207-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RTS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 cS LCC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. t nar ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III Recorder Acting Recorder 5, Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07840-06

    Original file (07840-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7840-06 1Nov06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference...