DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No:
28 January 2002
10858-02
This is in reference to your application,
December 2002.
’
DD Form 149, dated 24
You contended in your application that because your initial
request to be discharged on 1 January 2003 and your request to
resign your commission effective 1 February 2003 were not
processed in a timely manner you will not be discharged until 1
March 2003.
You were concerned that because of this delay you
will be caught in a stop loss situation and may be recalled to
active duty.
action to discharge you effective 1 January or, in the
alternative, on or before 1 February 2003.
Therefore, you requested that the Board take
The stop loss message is dated 7 January 2003 and precluded the
discharge of officers with an approved separation date after 15
January 2003.
Since your formal request to be discharged on 1
February 2003 is controlling, you became subject to the stop
loss even if your 1 February 2003 date had been approved.
Therefore, on 14 January 2003, the Board denied your request for
a change in the discharge date.
Subsequently, you informed the examiner assigned to your case
that Headquarters Marine Corps had expedited your discharge
request and has discharged you effective 14 January 1993.
you have been discharged,
required and your case is hereby closed administratively.
further action by the Board is not
Since
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010456
The applicant requests payment of Retroactive Stop Loss Special Pay (RSLSP) for the period 4 October 2002 to 3 October 2003. The final RSLSP application deadline expired on 21 October 2012. f. The evidence provided with the applicant's application and the coupled applicable stop loss policy in place during his period of mobilization supports a recommendation to approve his application. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008374C071029
Had the applicant known that he had lost 49 days of leave at the end of the fiscal year, he most likely would have adjusted his terminal leave dates to prevent going into an excess leave balance at his final retirement out-processing. Although the applicant was prevented from taking leave due to operational considerations, he was not authorized special leave accrual since he did not actually deploy. Since the applicant’s debt was incurred while he was still serving on active duty (excess...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006262
The second is for service members whose eligibility for retirement was suspended by Stop Loss. It states that RSLSP is a special pay for military members (including RC members) and former and retired members under the jurisdiction of the Secretary who, while serving on active duty at any time from 11 September 2001 to 30 September 2008, had their enlistment or period of obligated service involuntarily extended or whose established date of separation, release from active duty, or approved...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021292
His request for RSLSP was denied twice because item 6 (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 September 2003 shows 26 September 2003. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 14 September 1994, served in the DEP from 14 September 1994 to 16 January 1995, and entered active duty in the RA on 17 January 1995. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02600
__________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The DPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Any action he took (like withdrawing his retirement in July 2003) would never have occurred if he were not wrongfully affected by the March 2003 Stop Loss. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022225
Evidence of record shows on: * 1 October 2000, he was promoted to CW4, which incurred a 2-year ADSO [ending on 30 September 2002] * 29 November 2001, he submitted a request for voluntary retirement * 14 January 2002, his request was disapproved by PERSCOM * July 2002, he was assigned to Germany * 13 June 2003, AC unit stop loss was lifted and all component skill-based stop loss was partially lifted * 9 January 2005, he deployed to Iraq * 2 August 2005, his second request for voluntary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05412
The denial letter stated, in part, at no time were you held beyond an approved retirement date due to stop-loss However, PL 111-32, § 310, in addition to covering circumstances extending service beyond an approved retirement date, states or whose eligibility for retirement was suspended pursuant to 10 U.S.C. He is only claiming retroactive stop-loss special pay compensation for the time between 11 September 2001, when the stop-loss rules went into effect, and the 12-month period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079445C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that her date of promotion to chief warrant officer three (CW3) be reinstated to her original promotion date or the date of Suspension of Voluntary Separation of Officers and Enlisted Soldiers from the Active Army (stop loss) action, 2 December 2001 and that she receive back pay for this period.3. The officer will not be eligible again for promotion as a result of action by the promotion selection board or special selection board that recommended him or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006182
A DA Form 3340-R (Request for Reenlistment or Extension in the Regular Army) shows she requested reenlistment and that her request was approved on 1 July 2003. It states that RSLSP is a special pay for military members to include members of the Reserve Component (RC), former and retired members under the jurisdiction of the Secretary who while serving on active duty at any time from 11 September 2001 to 30 September 2009 their enlistment or period of obligated service was involuntarily...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02107
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because he applied for a Stop Loss waiver that was approved, he did not have enough time before his retirement date to use 10 remaining days of leave on his account. DPPRRP notes that the applicant only had 2 days from his Stop Loss waiver approval to his effective retirement date but states that the applicant had the opportunity to extend his retirement effective date up to 30 days and neglected to...