Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10674-02
Original file (10674-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                  MEH:ddj
                  Docket No: 10674-02
                  25 March 2003

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2)      NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 811/104 of 27 February 2003
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B t Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AT rating.

2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.


Docket No: 10674-02

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       He was discharged and reenlisted on 20/21 August 1999 (prior to passing through zone “B”), vice on or about 22/23 July 2001. The term remains 5 years.

b.       The 24 month NAVPERS 1070/62 1 extension agreement, operative date on or about 25 July 2001, is null and void.

c.       The above changes will entitle petitioner to a zone “B” SRB, award level 2.0, for the AT rating.

d.       That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        G.L. ADAMS
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


25 March 2003



                                                                        W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                                        Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10694-02

    Original file (10694-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, flied enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AT rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10744-02

    Original file (10744-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ABF rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10582-02

    Original file (10582-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CM rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10894-02

    Original file (10894-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10462-02

    Original file (10462-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating and advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10376-02

    Original file (10376-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTM rating (NEC 9238). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09275-02

    Original file (09275-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 9275-02 4 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board fOr Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08343-02

    Original file (08343-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IC rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03383-03

    Original file (03383-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 19 October 2001 is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04701-02

    Original file (04701-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone FC rating (NEC 1332). “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...