Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08694-01
Original file (08694-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT  OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y   A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

JRE 
Docket No:  8694-01 
18 March  2002 

From:  chairman, Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records 
To: 

Secretary of  the Navy 

Subj: 

FORMER 
REVIEW  OF NAVAL RECORDw- 

Ref: 

(a)  10 U.S.C.  1552 

Encl : 

(1)  DD  Form  149 
(2)  Subject's naval  record 

1.  Pursuant to  the provisions of  reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred  to as Petitioner, 
filed  enclosure (I) with  this Board  requesting, in  effect, that  his  naval  record  be corrected  to 
show  that  he  was  assigned  a reenlistment code of  RE-1 vice the RE-4 code he  was  assigned 
on  14 May  1997. 

2.  The Board, consisting of  Messrs.  Carlsen, Ensley  and  McBride,  reviewed  Petitioner's 
allegations of  error and  injustice on  21  February  2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, 
determined  that  the corrective action  indicated below  should be  taken  on  the available 
evidence of  record.  Documentary  material  considered by  the Board  consisted of the 
enclosures, naval  records, and  applicable statutes, regulations and  policies. 

3.  The Board,  having  reviewed all  the  facts of  record  pertaining  to  Petitioner's allegations 
of  error and  injustice finds as follows: 

a.  Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies 

available under existing law and  regulations within  the Department of  the Navy. 

b.  Although enclosure (1) was  filed  not  in  a timely  manner,  the Board  concluded that it 

would  be  in  the interest of justice  to consider the application on  its merits. 

c.  Petitioner served on  active duty from 7 April  to  14 May  1997, when  he was 

discharged  with  an  uncharacterized, entry level  separation, for erroneous entry (other).  He 
was  assigned a reenlistment code of  RE-4.  The specific basis  for his separation were the 
residual effects of  reconstructive knee surgery he underwent prior  to  his enlistment in  the 
Navy.  Although he disclosed the condition before he enlisted, neither he nor the medical 
authorities who approved his enlistment were aware that the knee had  not healed  to the point 
where it could withstand the rigors of  military  training. 

CSNCLUSION: 

Upon  review  and  consideration of  all  the  evidence of  record,  the Board  was  not  persuaded 
that  Petitioner was physically qualified for  military  service at the time of  his discharge, or 
that  his discharge  was  otherwise erroneous.  As  such,  he was  not  eligible for an  RE-1 
reenlistment code.  It  further concludes,  however,  that as  there is no indication in  available 
records  that  Petitioner committed any acts of  misconduct during his brief  period  of  service, 
or that  he  did  not  perform  his  duties to the best  of  his abilities,  the stigma associated  with  an 
RE-4 reenlistment code is unjust  in  this case.  At~~c~rdingly, 
following corrective  action. 

the Board  recommends the 

RECOMMENDATION: 

a.  That  Petitioner's  naval  record  be corrected to show  that he was assigned a 

reenlistment code of  RE-3E on  14  May  1997, in  lieu  of  the RE-4  code he actually  received 
on  that date. 

b.  That  so much  of  Petitioner's  request  for correction of  his  naval  record  as exceeds 

the foregoing be  denied. 

c.  That a copy of  this  Report  of  Proceedings be  filed  in  Petitioner's  naval  record. 

4.  Pursuant to Section  6(c) of  the  revised  Procedures of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval 
Records (32 Code of  Federal  Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it  is certified that a quorum was 
present at  the  Board's  review  and  deliberations,  and  that  the foregoing is a true and  complete 
record  of  the  Board's  proceedings in  the  above entitled  matter. 

ROBERT D.  ZSALMAN 
Recorder 

AMES  R'.  EXNICIOS 
Acting  Recorder 

5 .   Pursuant to the delegation of authority  set out in  Section 6(e) of  the revised  Procedures 
of  the Board  for correction of  Naval  Records (32 Code of  Federal Regulations, Section 
723.6(e))  and  having assured compliance with  its provisions,  it is hereby announced that the 
foregoing corrective action,  taken  under  the authority of  reference (a), has been  approved by 
the Board  on  behalf  of  the Secretary of  the Navy. 

%&%  Executive Directo 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04620-01

    Original file (04620-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted membr of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 11 June 1997. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc, Ms. Gilbert, and Mr. Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08432-01

    Original file (08432-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Additionally, the applicable regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous entry-alcohol abuse. " That Petitioner's naval record be corrected'by issuing him a new DD Form 214 which reflects that he served on active duty from 8 February to 8 March...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07857-01

    Original file (07857-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 February 2000. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the assignment of the RE-3B reenlistment code. That...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02338-03

    Original file (02338-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To : Secretary of the Navy Docket No: 2338-03 12 September 2003 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 T ~ G Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08179-01

    Original file (08179-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 24 November 1998. At that time, he was not recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07771-01

    Original file (07771-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was reduced in grade from LCPL (E-3) to PFC (E-2), vice to W T (E-1) . Since Petitioner has been treated no differently than others discharged by reason of drug abuse, the Board concludes that there was no error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4B reenlistment code. The Board further...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08458-01

    Original file (08458-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. g. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of weight control failure as evidence by his failure of three PRT1s within a four year period. That Petitioner's naval record by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 15 August 1997, to RE-3T b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07261-01

    Original file (07261-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N OC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 TJR Docket No: 7261-01 5 April 2002 From: To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Sub j : REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07625-01

    Original file (07625-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. At that time he was not recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07640-98

    Original file (07640-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 7640-98 30 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy L REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code of...