ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010862
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 May 2011, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions b. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010890
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 May 2007, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 dated, 31 May 2012, DD Form 214, and a VA Rating Decision dated 5 October 2010.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010896
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states in effect, that his medical discharge needs to be corrected to include PTSD/TBI as an additional criteria for his medical discharge. A Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: An online application in lieu of DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010900
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with an honorable discharge. On 18 November 2003, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of honorable. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010908
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs, wrongfully using marijuana x 2 (090804-090904 and 090810-090910), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120011027
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for adjustment disorder, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 10 April 2003, the separation authority directed the applicants separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120011263
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Further, the applicant contends that his NCOIC is the one that pushed for his discharge; however, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120011471
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductabuse of illegal drugs for the wrongful use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 December 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120011562
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 051202 Discharge Received: Date: 060121 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: Commanche Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry Regiment, Buedingen, Germany Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040927, incapacitated for the proper performance of your duties as result of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor or drugs (040726),...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012058
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for leaving his appointed place of duty (070113); failing to report to his appointed place of duty (070114); being disrespectful in language towards SGT JMD (070129); being disrespectful in deportment and language...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012193
On 21 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 4 May 2011, for misconduct (drug abuse), under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), with a SPD Code of JKK, and a RE code of 4. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," and the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012215
Applicant Name: ????? At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012418
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 14 July 2011, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012427
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 October 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012443
Applicant Name: ????? The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Army National Guard Regulation 600-200 sets forth the basic authority for the Army National Guard and establishes the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012626
On 22 July 2005, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The Army Discharge Review Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. The analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life and noted her accomplishments in her career as a registered nurse; however, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012948
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with an honorable discharge. The separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of honorable. The unit commander properly initiated discharge proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, AR 635-200, in effect at the time, by reason of personality disorder, with a characterization of service of honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013067
On 14 August 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013107
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 3 November 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial/AR-635-200 Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 2-19th Infantry Regiment, Fort Benning, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: OAD 22 February 2011, 4 Weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 00 years, 05 months, 12 days h. Total Service: 00 years, 07 months, 25 days i. On 31 October 2011, the separation authority approved...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013264
He requests an upgrade of his discharge to honorable and a change to the reason for his discharge. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board JOSEPH M. BYERS Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013273
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst recommends that an administrative change be made to block 25, separation authority to read AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, and block 26, separation code to JKQ, as it was approved by the separation authority. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: Change the authority for separation to AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c with a corresponding SPD code of JKQ.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013289
The reason I want to change my status to Honorable is so I can get back into the workforce, I have never had any trouble with the law but every employer overlooks my application when they see my DD214, which states that I was discharged with a General (Under Honorable) for Misconduct (Drug Abuse). Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 October 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013352
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on his medical condition. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 July 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductabuse of illegal drugs, for testing positive...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013357
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for being involved in numerous acts of misconduct, which consisted of failing to report to his appointed place of duty, disobeying a noncommissioned officer, incapacitation of duty due to previous overindulgence of alcohol and making a false official...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013479
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander's reviewed the proposed separation action and recommended approval of the separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013601
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for driving while impaired, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013602
On 7 April 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. However, in review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013794
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120013794 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120014169
Applicant Name: ????? On 28 February 2012, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed a general, under honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120014192
He was 19 years old at the time of entry and a high school graduate. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120014434
The applicant states, in effect, his discharge should be upgraded based on his overall service record to include his combat service. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 April 2002, for a period of 3 years. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293, dated 6 July 2012.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120015120
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060815 Discharge Received: Date: 060825 Chapter: 5-13 AR: 635-200 Reason: Personality Disorder RE: SPD: JFX Unit/Location: 9th Military Police Detachment, 95th Military Police Battalion, Sandhofen, Germany Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. On 15 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120015515
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 May 2012, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120015908
Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and informed the applicant of his rights. On 23 March 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of serious offenses. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016007
The evidence of record shows that on 3 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for being unable to meet the physical fitness standards required to graduate basic training. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided an online application dated, 18 July 2012. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016008
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 February 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of serious offenses, specifically for: (1) wrongfully possessing an unknown amount of marijuana (031009); (2) wrongfully using marijuana, a controlled substance (031224 040123); (3) absent without leave (031117 ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016040
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., pattern of misconduct) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. b. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016044
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 5 October 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200 Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 3rd IN Rgt, Fort Myer, VA f. Enlistment Date/Term: 19 October 2009, 3 years, 23 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 11 months, 17 days h. Total Service: 1 year, 11 months, 17 days i. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant did not provide any...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016226
The evidence shows that on 14 December 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct; specifically for the following offenses: a. receiving an Article 15 (101123) for failing to report and being disrespectful in language to an NCO b. receiving a second Article 15 (111116), for failing to report, disobeying a lawful order from an NCO, and lying to an NCO c....
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016439
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016554
On 4 November 2008, the applicants senior commanders reviewed his request for discharge and recommended that it be accepted with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. However, the applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24 with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Unacceptable Conduct, and the separation code is "JNC."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016589
It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue and determined that the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016828
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that the reason for his honorable discharge, which is a personality disorder, needs to be corrected. He would have been diagnosed by competent medical authority with a personality disorder prior to being honorably discharged from the Army. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Personality Disorder," and the separation code is "JFX."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120016961
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120016961 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined that the applicant's length and quality of his service were not significantly meritorious to overcome the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120017182
That was not him and the Army is where he really wants to be. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge or a change to the narrative reason for separation to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code. Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120017305
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 August 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120017778
On 9 December 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120017850
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120017850 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Prior Board Review:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120017910
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 July 1995, for a period of 2 years and 17 weeks. On 3 December 1997, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 12 December 1997, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120018057
IN THE CASE OF: Mr BOARD DATE: 10 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120018057 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the term of service under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant states, in effect, the discharge was...