ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120018338
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 November 2006 for a period of 3 years. On 7 May 2012, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 23 May 2012, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019008
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Pattern of Misconduct," and the separation code is "JKA." Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated 5 October 2012 and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019085
On 1 October 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019188
He served for a little over 3 years and was discharged for misconduct. His service record reflects that he was ordered to serve on active duty two times (110905-120903 and 090519-110730) and each time he earned a characterization of service of honorable. On 28 August 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019401
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 16 September 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. On 3 October 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. In fact, the applicants Article...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019404
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 13 May 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for the wrongful use of marijuana between 12 February 2009 and 12 March 2009. On 28 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019435
He served for a little over 3 years and was discharged for misconduct. His service record reflects that he was ordered to serve on active duty two times (110905-120903 and 090519-110730) and each time he earned a characterization of service of honorable. On 28 August 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019485
Overseas Service: Korea p. Combat Service: None q. Decorations/Awards: AM, ARCOM-2, AAM-5, AGCM-4, NDSM, GWOTSM KDSM, NPDR-2, ASR, OSR-2 r. Administrative Separation Board: Yes s. Performance Ratings: Yes t. Counseling Statements: None u. On 24 February 2012, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019497
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 29 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120019497 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the length and quality of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019627
Applicant Name: ????? On 22 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense)," and the separation code is "JKQ."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019642
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. On 17 October 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019645
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to his reentry (RE) code. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 26 February 2009 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, 14-12c JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 1st Bn, 325th IN Regiment, Fort Bragg, NC f. Enlistment Date/Term: 14 September 2007, 3 years and 21 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020002
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 November 1995 and was discharged 9 May 2009. On 30 March 2012, the intermediate commander recommended the applicant elimination under the provisions of AR 600-8-24, Chapter 4, paragraph 4-2(a) for substandard performance of duty and under paragraph 4-2(b) for misconduct and moral or professional dereliction based on the applicant's failure to exercise necessary leadership, acts of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020045
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 July 2000 for a period of 4 years. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020054
IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 17 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120020054 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of her service to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020087
The Board recommended the applicant be separated with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. S Army Reserve involuntarily separated her after she had failed to participate with her reserve unit and issued her an under other than honorable discharge. Arlington, VA Date: 1 April 2013 The Army Discharge Review Board, under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in page 1, directs the ARBA Promulgation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020103
The applicant requests an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable, and a change to the narrative reason from misconduct to secretarial authority. Although the separation authoritys decision memorandum is not available, the DD Form 214 reflects the result of the separation authoritys approving the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directing the applicants discharge with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020254
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 2 July 2007 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200 paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 1/28th In, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 17 October 2005, for 4 years and 18 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 7 months, 19 days h. Total Service: 1 year, 7 months, 19 days i. On 28 June 2007, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020265
The DD Form 214 indicates she was released from initial active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with her service described as uncharacterized. Following completion of the MOS training course, the applicant was released from active duty with an effective date of 18 April 2003, and transferred to 352d Combat Hospital, Oakland, CA, to continue her service in the U.S. Army Reserve. Army Regulation 635-200 stipulates...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020279
The evidence shows that on 13 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for receiving a field grade Article 15 on 18 August 2010, for wrongfully using D-Amphetamines and D-Methamphetamines. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 October 2010, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020282
IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 10 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120020282 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the enclosed Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Her DD Form 214 indicates she was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020287
Current ENL Service: 07 Yrs, 06 Mos, 11 Days Per DD Form 215 dated 22 April 2013. The evidence of record indicates that on 6 October 2010, a Board of Inquiry recommended the applicant be involuntarily separated from the United States Army based on misconduct and moral or professional dereliction with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020353
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge characterization from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for the discharge, the SPD and RE codes. On 11 March 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, by reason of misconduct, for the commission of serious offenses; specifically for being arrested by civilian authorities for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020360
On 15 May 2012, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. At the time of separation the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3 which indicates the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020403
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 25 November 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Unsatisfactory Participation, AR 135-178, NIF/NIF e. Unit of assignment: 680th EN CO, Canandiagua, NY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 15 November 2008, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 0 months, 10 days h. Total Service: 3 years, 2 months, 13 days i. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020406
The board recommended the applicants discharge with characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 28 April 2006, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020426
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 8 June 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Condition, Not a Disability / AR 635-200, Paragraph 5-17 / JFV / RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: A Company, 40th Expeditionary Signal Battalion Fort Huachuca, AZ f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 16 August 2009 / 3 years, 30 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 9 months, 23 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 9 months, 23 days i. The evidence of record shows that on 27...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020436
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 8 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120020436 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Army policy states that an under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020442
The evidence indicates the applicant requested an administrative separation board and was entitled to one because he was being recommended for an under other than honorable conditions discharge at the time of initiation of the separation action. The evidence contained in the applicants service record shows that on 13 December 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020501
It indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 8-27f, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3. It indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 8-27f, NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020575
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 APRIL 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120020575 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the enclosed Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The record shows the applicant, while in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020586
On 12 September 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board (although he was not entitled to a board) and did not indicate if a statement was submitted in his own behalf. On 30 October 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020596
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board JOSEPH M. BYERS Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record FG - Field Grade IADT Initial Active Duty...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020606
On 21 November 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 30 December 2003, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-b, for a pattern misconduct, with a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKA and a reentry code of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020682
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT The applicant provided a DD Form 149. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with a characterization of service described as uncharacterized.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020739
On 8 October 2009, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. There are 10 negative counseling statements dated between 26 May 2009 and 5 October 2009, for failing to report, disobeying lawful orders, disrespecting NCOs, insubordination, and initiation of discharge proceedings. The record confirms that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020742
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 February 2009 for a period of 3 years and 14 weeks. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293 and a DD Form 214 with his application.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020779
The applicants service record shows that on 14 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, specifically for: * failing to maintain physical progression * lack of motivation/respect/discipline to train * sleeping during duty hours * disruptive influence to unit morale 2. On 1 October 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020817
Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 August 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The record of trial by summary court-martial indicates the applicant was ordered to be confined for 30 days.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020849
Prior Board Review: None SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 July 2009, for a period of 3 years and 16 weeks. On 9 February 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was separated on 22 February 2012, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c(1), for misconduct (AWOL), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020860
Applicant Name: ????? On 28 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020871
On 16 March 2007, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of serious offenses. The applicants record shows 216 days of lost time (060620-070121), as a result of military confinement. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020881
The record shows that on 11 April 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for driving recklessly while under the influence of alcohol and in possession of a concealed weapon (110205). An undated memo from the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020900
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020908
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, under the provision of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020913
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 1 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120020913 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020940
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 1 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120020940 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service is now too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his service to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020959
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 15 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120020959 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that clemency is warranted based on the applicants length and quality of his service, his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020994
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst noted the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021010
He was discharged as a PVT/E-2. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), for misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record.