Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010862
Original file (AR20120010862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2012/05/29	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, “Request upgrade of discharge and upgrade of RE code so I can return to the military.  Personal family problems led to me making mistakes which included agreeing to take discharge.”

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 110510
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110607   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: 154th Transportation Company, 180th Transportation Battalion, 4th Sustainment Brigade (Provisional), Fort Hood, Texas  

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 110404, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty (110131); failed to obey a lawful order issued by LTC RMV by wrongfully going past the 150 mile radius without having submitted a mileage pass request (110311); derelict in the performance of his duties in that he willfully failed to complete his corrective training (110215); wrongfully use Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (110221); reduction to E-1; forfeiture of $733 pay per month for 2 months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days; (FG). 

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 100713    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  19 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	0 Yrs, 10  Mos, 25  Days ?????
Total Service:  		0 Yrs, 10  Mos, 25  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 88M10 Motor Transport Operator    GT: 115   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:     
Post Service Accomplishments: None



VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 10 May 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, for the following: submitting a urine specimen urinalysis and tested positive for Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), a Schedule I controlled substance (110228); failing to report to report to his appointed place of duty (110131); with full knowledge of his required duties, was derelict in his performance of said duties in that he failed to complete his corrective training, as it was his duty to execute (110215); failed to obey a lawful order issued by LTC RMV, by wrongfully going past the 150 mile radius without having submitted a mileage pass request (110311); receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for each one of the aforementioned offenses and being sentenced to reduction to E-1; forfeiture of $733 pay per month for 2 months; extra duty for 45 days; and restriction to the limits of his work area and those areas designated by his company chain of command (110404) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.
         
       On 11 May 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 16 May 2011, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting an honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge because of mitigating circumstances which contributed to his misconduct.  Specifically, he claims family issues at home resulted in his discharge.  While the applicant may believe his stress at home was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record of evidence does not demonstrate that he sought relief from stress through his command or the numerous Army community services like the Chaplain, Army Community and Family Support Services, Community Counseling Center, and other medical resources available to all Soldiers.  Likewise, he has provided no evidence that he should not be held responsible for his misconduct.
       
       Furthermore, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4.  An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: ?????         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and a DD Form 214

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 


















 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0     No change 5 
Reason -     Change 0     No change 5 
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




JOSEPH M. BYERS
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder












Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20120010862
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 4 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012767

    Original file (AR20080012767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 22 June 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011421

    Original file (AR20100011421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20100028012

    Original file (AR20100028012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025224

    Original file (AR20100025224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006644

    Original file (AR20120006644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 January 2012, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the administrative separation board and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant contends the administrative separation board as outlined by military legal counsel was illegal. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated (120320); Memorandum, Request for Reconsideration of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110001699

    Original file (AR20110001699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 October 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for the wrongful use of a controlled substance by testing positive for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (090420), and any other misconduct. The narrative reason specified by Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012662

    Original file (AR20080012662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 18 September 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct for failures to report x 2 at 0600 and 0900 (0650608); and at 0630 (060320); and failure to obey lawful general regulation (060320), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018789

    Original file (AR20110018789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 17 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 2 September 2011, self authored statement.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001191

    Original file (AR20130001191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 17 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for wrongfully using cocaine...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012127

    Original file (AR20110012127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used cocaine between (110212-110215), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 March 2011, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit...