Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120011471
Original file (AR20120011471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2012/06/08	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like an upgrade of his discharge and a change to his reentry eligibility (RE) code.  He contends that upon return from Iraq he was suffering with PTSD, asked for help and received no help.  His DD Form 214 now shows that he is a drug abuser and this has "Messed" up everthing. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 091211
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 100128   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: D Co, 1/1st Avn Regt, Fort Riley, KS 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 091002, Wrongful use of marijuana between (090801 and 090901), reduction to E1; forfeiture of $700.00 pay per month for two months (suspended); extra duty for 45 days; and Letter of Reprimand, (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: 050301    Current ENL Term: 06 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	04 Yrs, 10  Mos, 28  Days ?????
Total Service:  		04 Yrs, 10  Mos, 28  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 15R10/AH-64 Attack Hel Rep   GT: 99   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (070606-080806)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, NDSM, ICM-w/CS, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed










VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 11 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs for the wrongful use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.
       
       On 15 December 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation Board (which he was not entitled too), and did submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 28 December 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and document submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant contends his single incident of misconduct occurred when he returned from Iraq suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and because he was not provided with assistance for his issue with marijuana.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's contentions; however, the discrediting entry constituted a departure from the standards of conduct expected of Soldiers in the Army.  The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.  The analyst having examined all the circumstances determined that the applicant's single incident of misconduct did indeed adversely affect the quality of service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. 
       
       
       
       
       
       
       The narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives.  The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," the separation code is "JKK," and the reentry code is "RE 4."  Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28, separation code, entered in block 26, and RE Code, entered in block 27 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation.  
       
       Furthermore, the record of evidence does not demonstrate that he sought assistance through his command or the numerous Army community services like the Chaplain, Army Community and Family Support Services, Community Counseling Center, and other medical resources available to all Soldiers. 
       
       The analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       Further, the record does not support the issue that the applicant suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue about changing his reentry eligibility (RE) code.  However, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a RE code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. 
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service to include the RE code were all proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 12 September 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel:  yes [redacted]

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 and Self-Authored Statement.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  

Further, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the Board, on the basis of equity, voted to change the applicant’s reason for discharge, authority, separation code, and reentry code and directed that block 25, separation authority be changed to “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c,” block 26, separation code be changed to JKQ, block 27, reentry code be changed to 3, and block 28, narrative reason for separation be changed to Misconduct (Serious Offense), as it was approved by the separation authority.   





        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 5    No change 0
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: Misconduct (Serious Offense)
Other: Change block 25, separation authority to “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c,” block 26, separation code to JKQ, block 27, reentry code to 3, and block 28, narrative reason for separation to Misconduct (Serious Offense). 
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder




















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20120011471
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 4 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120001179

    Original file (AR20120001179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110017194

    Original file (AR20110017194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for being arrested for possessing spice, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20 October 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019338

    Original file (AR20100019338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 050618 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Abuse of Illegal Drugs) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: A Co, 1-131st In Regt, Fort Polk, LA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050413, wrongfully used marijuana (041224-050124); reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $668 pay x 2 months, extra duty for 45 days, and restriction for 45 days, (FG). The DD Form 214 indicates the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110009912

    Original file (AR20110009912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4". Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016077

    Original file (AR20080016077.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Except for the foregoing modification to the applicant's reentry eligibility (RE) code, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014702

    Original file (AR20090014702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: None submitted by the applicant. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Misconduct (Serious Offense) under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12c, with a corresponding Separation (SPD) Code of JKQ.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009686

    Original file (AR20120009686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using marijuana (100617), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012424

    Original file (AR20080012424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120002303

    Original file (AR20120002303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 23 January 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017979

    Original file (AR20100017979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 March 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) for the wrongful use of anabolic steroids, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 May 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the...