Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007587
Original file (AR20120007587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2012/04/11	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is currently attending a medical academy as a "Health Info Tech" and he is trying to receive his chapter 30 to help pay for the school.  He was also told to wait six months before applying for an upgrade.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: Undated
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 111005   Chapter: 14-12b    AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern of Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: Inland Cargo Tranportation Company, 10th Transportation Battalion, 7th Sustainment Brigade (R)(P), Joint Base Langley-Eustis, VA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080123, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time x 3 (071213), (071101), 070914), reduced to E-1; forfeiture of $303; 14-day extra duty and restriction, (CG)

080318, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time (080212), 14-day extra duty and restriction (both suspended), (CG)

100604, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time (100426); AWOL (100329-100331); disobeyed an NCO order (100505), reduced to E-3 (suspended); 14-day extra duty, (CG)

110517, failed to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time (110330); disrespectful in language toward an NCO (110223), reduced to E-3 (suspended); 14-day extra duty and restriction, (CG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 091210    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	01 Yrs, 09 Mos, 26 Days ?????
Total Service:  		04 Yrs, 09 Mos, 03 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR (070103-070627) / NA
			     RA (070628-091209) / HD
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 88H (Cargo Specialist)   GT: 87   EDU: GED   Overseas: SWA   Combat: Iraq (090401-100215)
Decorations/Awards: AAM-2; AGCM; NDSM; ICM-CS; GWOTSM; ASR; CAB

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states, in effect, that he is attending a medical academy.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 30 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for: receiving a company grade Article 15 (080123) for failing to report to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed; receiving a summarized Article 15 (080318) for failing to report; receiving a company grade Article 15 (100604) for failing to report; lastly, for receiving multiple negative counselings for failing to communicate and failing to report, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 6 September 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 15 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of the former Soldier’s service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue about his desire to use the benefits of the GI Bill.  However, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 7 September 2012         Location: Washington, D.C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 2 April 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20120007587
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012173

    Original file (AR20090012173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he was disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer on or about 080910; disobeyed a lawful General Order on or about 080817; wrongfully used provoking speeches and gestures towards another Soldier on or about 080817;...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016295

    Original file (AR20080016295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010586

    Original file (AR20090010586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 December 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010452

    Original file (AR20090010452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 27 August 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110004467

    Original file (AR20110004467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 1 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100026601

    Original file (AR20100026601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 9 April 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110013618

    Original file (AR20110013618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he assaulted a SGT, a noncommissioned officer (100224), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007200

    Original file (AR20120007200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 August 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12a AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-minor infractions for engaging in a pattern of misconduct consisting solely of minor military disciplinary infractions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007693

    Original file (AR20120007693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I had no problems in my early service, but the deployment to Kuwait and the service in Iraq staging and at the beginning of the war effected me. On 6 April 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007609

    Original file (AR20120007609.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he received injustice treatment from his first line supervisor. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity and he has not provided any...