Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2012/04/20 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, "I used to be a great, outstanding, and disciplined [sic] Soldier. I love my country and serving my country was the greatest thing I have ever done. During a weekend I did a minor offence driving my car not in uniform, not during my work and for that reason I [sic] get a general discharge; I feel and I know this discharge was completely wrong and I respectfully ask this honorable board to take action on my favor."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080211
Discharge Received: Date: 080319 Chapter: 14, Sec II AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct, (Civil conviction) RE: SPD: JKB Unit/Location: Forward Support Company, 4th Battalion, 101st Aviation Regiment, Fort Campbell, Kentucky
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 071130, made and uttered to Wal-Mart Stores certain checks, in words and figures as follows, check number 1008 in the amount of $28.12; check number 1010 in the amount of $29.60; check number 1011 in the amount of $152.72; (071016); made and uttered to Telesvcfee a certain check, in words and figures as follows, check number 1012 in the amount of $25.00 (071010) and did thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain sufficient funds in the USAA Federal Savings Bank for payment of such checks in full upon their presentment for payment; reduction to E-1; and 14 days extra duty; (CG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No ?????
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 31
Current ENL Date: 050926 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 24 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 24 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92F10 Petroleum Supply Specialist GT: 101 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Korea Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 11 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Section II, Paragraph 14-5a(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, conviction by civil court, for being convicted of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) by District Court (070927); and receiving a sentence of two years unsupervised probation; 30 days in jail, suspended on the condition that the applicant did not get another DUI or a driving on a suspended license offense during his probation; alcohol and other substance abuse treatment at the community counseling center; including fines, fees and costs totaling $697.00, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 19 February 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 10 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of the applicants available military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting an honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The applicant contends that he was incorrectly discharged for a civil offense that occurred while he was off duty and not in uniform. Army Regulation 635-200, in pertinent part, stipulates that a Soldier may be separated when initially convicted by civil authorities, or when action is taken that is tantamount to a finding of guilty, if a punitive discharge authorized for the same or a closely related offense under the Manual for Courts Martial or the sentence by civil authorities includes confinement for 6 months or more, without regard to suspension or probation.
The analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 21 September 2012 Location: Washington, D. C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: None
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, ERB, orders 074-0604, orders 079-0613 and a DD Form 214.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request) ?????
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20120008327
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011731
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 September 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for uttering worthless checks, with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013158
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 12 December 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (uttered six worthless checks totaling $1700.00 and failed to place sufficient funds in Pentagon Federal Credit Union for payment of such checks between 4 October 1996 and 21 October 1996; disobeyed a lawful command from a noncommissioned...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012602
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 24 January 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for numerous negative counseling statements for failure to report, received Company Grade Article 15s for larceny of $400, making a false official statement, forging checks and numerous supporting negative counseling statements with an under other...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003086
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted that the unit commander used Board Procedures when notifying the applicant that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110000025
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000762
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000449
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 March 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012928
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 January 1996, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of her case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. On 5 April 1996, the separation authority having reviewed the request for reconsideration submitted by the Applicant, approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015569
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012051
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 April 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (you have been counseled in writing for possession of tobacco product in violation of Battalion policy, wrongfully writing bad checks in the amount of $1737.00 to several different agencies, and failing to be at your appointed place of duty. The...