ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006628
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for desertion, without authority and with intent to remain away, deserting herself from the Army (050223 050505), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 8 August 2005, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006634
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 May 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, for being accused of of commiting indecent acts on another Soldier, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 May 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006636
The analyst noted that the applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The record indicates that on 14 June 2007, the separation authority in the grade of MAJ acting on assumption of command orders approved the separation action and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006639
The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the type of discharge he received from the U.S. Army Reserve. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief by changing the characterization of service to general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006644
On 18 January 2012, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendations of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant contends the administrative separation board as outlined by military legal counsel was illegal. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated (120320); Memorandum, Request for Reconsideration of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006646
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being found guilty by a Summary Court-Martial for multiple charges of wrongfully using cocaine, ecstasy and methamphetamine (050822), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006686
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for being absent without official leave (040512) and (040606-040608); for being counseled (040809 and 040909) several times for failing to report to his appointed place of duty; and for being arrested (040501) for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006688
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The applicant contends that he was discharged under the Dont Ask Dont Tell Policy; however, the applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006692
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for a history of discreditable conduct and conduct prejudical to good order and discipline including conduct violating the accepted standards of personal conduct found in the UCMJ, Army regulations, the civil law, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006696
Applicant Name: ????? Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006710
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006712
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006763
Also, he submitted a supplemental statement from his counsel requesting that the board grant the following on behalf of his client; that the narrative reason for separation be changed to "Secretarial Authority" with the corresponding Separation Code." The personnel Electronic Records Management System (IPERMS) which is the processing Records Center/Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR) does not have a copy of the applicant's administratrive separation packet; however, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006787
Applicant Name: ????? There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that being discharged was not her fault. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, dated (120323); Letter, Richland County Veterans Services Commission, dated (120326); and a DD Form 214, dated (070928).
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006789
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD Dishonorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006792
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 January 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of the applicants available military records, the issues and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006919
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 120104 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: 4th AD Regt, ADA R, Fort Bliss, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): The applicant stated in his application that he received two Article 15s; however, those documents are not contained in the available records. Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicants Official...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006931
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 June 2010, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006948
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 September 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007106
Applicant Name: ????? On 30 November 2004, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007107
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 August 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana (001203 010101) and (010519 010619) , with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 August 2001, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007116
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for two consecutive APFT failures, and failed to report to his appointed place of duty (100315) and (100512), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007117
Applicant Name: ????? The record shows that the applicant waived his rights to consult with legal counsel, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007121
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 June 2002, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007130
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 January 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for failing to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time (100303-101218) and being derelict in the performance of his duties (101218), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 February 2011, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007178
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 June 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007179
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for multiple acts of misconduct including having unauthorized personnel in his barracks room, several failures to report, disobeying NCOs, or correcting his financial obligations, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007184
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I would like to upgrade my General Under Honorable Discharge to an Honorable Discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct," the separation code is "JKK," and the reentry code is "RE 3."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007188
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 October 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense)", the separation code is "JKQ", and the reentry code is "RE 3".
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007190
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated 27 March 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007192
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Further, the analyst noted the applicant's issue about changing the reason for his discharge and the reentry code in order to rejoin the Army and serve again.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007193
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I was honorably discharged from the military with a condition code of 3 in 2009. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical condition, not a disability for being diagnosed by competent...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007197
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 November 2010 the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for using cocaine, a Schedule II controlled substance (100927), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007198
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007200
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 August 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12a AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-minor infractions for engaging in a pattern of misconduct consisting solely of minor military disciplinary infractions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007201
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 March 2010, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Further, notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge and on the basis of equity, the Board voted to change the applicants reason for discharge, authority, separation code, and reentry code.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007204
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 March 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007205
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007207
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007231
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states in effect, that he was accused of domestic violence and although he was innocent the evidence against him said he was guilty. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-5, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, conviction by civil...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007233
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Abuse of Illegal Drugs) for testing positive for marijuana on (091022), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 August 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007236
On 30 May 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions (although he was not entitled to a board) and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007242
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (120404), with an Issues Statement, dated (120404).
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007278
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being unable to complete Basic Combat Training due to a foot stress fracture and the time required for it to heal, with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. On 13 April 2011, the applicant consulted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007366
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007390
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 June 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using marijuana (040215 - 040316), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 5 June 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007399
However, contained in the documents submitted by the applicant his evidence shows that on 20 March 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for refusing to train due to family problems with his wife, disobeying orders, not training, and after having over 180 days the unit determined the applicant could not adapt to the military, and recommended him for discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007401
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007404
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for wrongfully using spice (110211), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 26 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007418
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable discharge. On 26 March 2007, the separation authority directed that the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted,...