ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005815
Application Receipt Date: 2012/03/14 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. On 11 April 2006, the separation authority reviewed the recommendations of the subordinate commanders, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005825
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The only pertinent evidence available for review regarding the applicant's discharge is the approval document from the separation authority and his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, which was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005830
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 August 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005832
Having this changed will enable me to move on with my life in a positive way. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 July 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for violating a lawful general regulation by wrongfully having an unauthorized relationship with FS MO by engaging in a romantic...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005835
I hope that one day I can work again with the Military in any way possible as a civilian. On 14 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005867
Applicant Name: ????? However, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, by reason of in lieu of trial by a court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and notwithstanding the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005880
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 July 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, and requested that his case be heard before an administrative separation board. The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and had 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005884
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12a by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12a by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005890
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 14 April 2011, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/Army Substance Abuse Program declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005892
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005895
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005942
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he received a Chapter 13 and discharged under a general discharge for failure of two consecutive physical fitness tests; he was not given an opportunity for a change in unit; he has never received an Article 15 in his whole career in the Army; and he has received the Army Good Conduct Medal for every three years of service. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005972
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005974
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 June 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for marijuana (110526); failing to go at the time to his appointed place of duty x 3, being derelict in performing his duties x 4, violating a lawful general regulation by driving his government...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005980
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 070425 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: C Btry, 1-182nd FA Bn, Fort Dix, NJ Time Lost: AWOL for 123 days (061109-070311), apprehended. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005999
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 041115 Discharge Received: Date: 050628 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 469th Med Co, Wichita, KS Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The applicant provided excerpts of her separation packet that indicate that on 15 November 2004, the unit...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006004
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 December 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12a, AR 635-200, by reason of minor disciplinary infractions misconductfor dereliction of duty; failure to report; and incapacitation for duty due to prior overindulgence of intoxicating liquor, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 29 January 2011, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006007
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 June 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006015
Applicant Name: ????? On 28 August 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006041
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2010, the separation authority reviewed the proposed action and directed the applicants discharge from the Army with service uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006070
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NA Date: NA Discharge Received: Date: 110319 Chapter: 4-2a AR: 600-8-24 Reason: Substandard Performance RE: SPD: JHK Unit/Location: C Co, Troop Command, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Germany Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006081
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he made bad choices that led to his discharge. On 26 April 2002, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006093
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade of his discharge to fully honorable. Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006097
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 19 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006118
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he regrets the way he acted while serving his country. In that time he had a few problems with a certain individual in his unit that his superiors wouldn't help him fix. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006228
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a fully honorable discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board that relief be denied.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006236
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense for failing to report on two occasions, wrongfully using cocaine two times, and wrongfully using methylenedioxymethamphetamine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 August 2006, the applicant consulted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006269
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst noted the applicant's contentions; however, the evidence of record shows that the command attempted to assist the applicant in performing and conducting himself to Army standards by providing counseling and by the imposition of non-judicial punishment. The applicant's record does not show any medical condition that would have not allowed him to continue to perform his duties to standard.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006347
On 11 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, disobeying a noncommissioned officer on diverse occasions and failing to report to his appointed place of duty, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200, provides...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006352
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving a company grade Article 15 for seven violations of Article 86, UCMJ; two violations of Article 91, UCMJ and three violations of Article 92, UCMJ (080707), for being counseled for failing to report to his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006353
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the record shows that on 25 February 2009, an additional separation authority (COL, IN, Commanding) approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006354
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 March 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 12, AR 135-178, by reason of misconduct for testing positive for THC (090319), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, in review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006355
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006356
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for stealing a debit card from a fellow Soldier, stealing a bluetooth headset and a pack of pens from AAFES, possession of the illegal substance K2 x 2, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 August 2010, the applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006374
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 March 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested a personal appearance before an administrative separation board (was not entitled to a board) and did not submit a statement on his behalf. On 19 April 2005, the separation authority reviewed the commanders recommendations, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006471
Total Service: 00 Yrs, 09 Mos, 13 Days ????? On 21 July 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006472
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 January 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for failing to be at his appointed place of duty on several occasions (110330, 110425, 110518, 110615, 110704, 110920, 110921, 110923, and 111011) and for going AWOL (111201-111205), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006489
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 July 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The senior intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006504
On 15 October 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant's contention that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006515
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Board further determined that denial of an administrative separation board constituted a prejudicial error to the rights of the applicant and the discharge is improper. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006517
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006523
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006524
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006526
Applicant Name: ????? On 28 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant's separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct," the separation code is "JGA," and the reentry code is "RE 3."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006535
The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006541
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 February 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006543
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Army Discharge Review Board is not empowered to restore former service member's grade, rate or rank.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006544
Applicant Name: ????? On 13 December 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the documents, and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006548
The analyst further noted that the applicant had completed almost two years of active military service, attained the grade of E-3, and had no other derogatory information in the service record. The Board will consider any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged for admitting to being homosexual with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006627
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Section III, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for being found in possession of drug paraphernalia (100904); being found in possession of marijuana (100904); and wrongfully having used marijuana (100804 100904), with a...