Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2012/04/12 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states: "I am appealing your decision on my uncharacterized discharged that I was given when I was discharged on April 21, 2011. I was injured on December 10th as a result of this injury I severely injured my left foot, severe pain in my lower back pain as a result of the traumatic injury that I suffered in my foot I also suffered pain in my lower back and left knee. When I went on sick call I was told that there was nothing that could be done for me because I had already been medically discharged. As of May 01, 2011, I have been granted a SERVICE CONNECTION OF 10% with the Department of Veteran Affairs Office. I am appealing that my discharged of uncharacterized discharged be overturned and upgraded to read HONORABLE.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 110411
Discharge Received: Date: 110421 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: C Co, 2/60th Inf, Fort Jackson, SC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 20
Current ENL Date: 100520 Current ENL Term: 04 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 11 Mos, 02 Days ?????
Total Service: 00 Yrs, 11 Mos, 02 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: 82 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 11 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being unable to complete Basic Combat Training due to a foot stress fracture and the time required for it to heal, with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. She was advised of her rights.
On 13 April 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of her case by an administrative separation Board (which she was not entitled too), and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an uncharacterized discharge.
On 14 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with an uncharacterized separation of service.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and documents she submitted, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper.
There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the applicants medical condition that caused her to be discharged. Army Regulation 635-200 provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. The evidence of record shows the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of discharge proceedings after she had completed 180 days of continuous active duty, thus no longer in entry level status. AR 635-200 defines entry level status for active duty Soldiers as the period of the first 180 days of continuous active duty. When the applicant was notified of the initiation of discharged, she had completed 10 months and 22 days of active duty service.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. However, the analyst found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 12 September 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, dated 29 March 2012 and Self-Authored Statement, dated 28 March 2012.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the applicants characterization is improper. The evidence of record supports the conclusion that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, Army Regulation 635-200, condition, not a disability, while in initial-entry level training status (IET). The board noted that she was no longer in entry level status at the time the discharge proceedings were initiated, and had completed more than 180 days of continuous active service. AR 635-200 defines entry level status for Regular Army Soldiers as the first 180-days of continuous active duty. In view of the aforementioned, the Board voted to grant relief by changing the characterization of service to fully honorable. However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 5 No change 0
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20120007278
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021489
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack of ability, lack of self discipline, lack of motivation, and repeatedly failed the Army Physical Fitness Test, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 24 November 2004, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025019
The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings, Report of Medical...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025227
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with bilateral foot pain, left ankle stress fracture, not resolving with conservative treatment for the past 5 weeks; which, she did not have prior to service. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006524
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025014
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 September 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized discharge. Army regulations stipulate that the service of any individual who has more than 180 days of continuous active duty at the time of their notification of an impending...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015921
Applicant Name: ????? A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005835
I hope that one day I can work again with the Military in any way possible as a civilian. On 14 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004795
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst determined no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and the applicant's service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120002245
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 November 2011, the separation authority signature appears on the DA Form 4707 which the applicant submitted; however, block 29 which shows whether the action by the separation authority directed the applicants discharge or retention on active duty appears to be blank. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019645
Applicant Name: ????? Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.