Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006634
Original file (AR20120006634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2012/03/29	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "This is a narrative responding the type of separation from the armed forces shown in my DD 214. During my time in the army myself and a couple of other soldiers were question by the military police because of allegations of a female soldier about been sexually assaulted. An investigation was conducted regarding the incident and as a result we all got chapter out of the military for the reason of misconduct. We were not charge for doing anything for this incident but just these allegations were enough for the military to decide to separate us from the military with the option to come back in a period of 2 years. 

For the past 15 years I been trying to get a decent job to suport for  me and my family and its not happening. I just need this discharce to be chance so I can get a better chance in this job search. The last job I had was my dream job Letter Carrier in the postal service and it didnt happen for me again, It was just a contract of one year !! For this reasons I aks for a little help here . I know I can do better out there than just been unemployed like I am right now."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 030512
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 030611   Chapter: 14-12c       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: 289th Quartermaster Company, STB, Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  26
Current ENL Date: 010725    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 10  Mos, 17  Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 10  Mos, 17  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92A/Autom Log Spc   GT: 102   EDU: Coll Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM and ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 8 May 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, for being accused of of commiting indecent acts on another Soldier, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 12 May 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, was not eligible for an administrative separation board due to not meeting the minimum time of service requirement, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 15 May 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
       
       The record contains a Military Police Report dated 27 August 2002.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of the former Soldier’s service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that for the past 15 years he has been trying to get a decent job to support himself and his family but has not been able to hold down employment; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       Finally, the applicant also contends that the narrative reason for his discharge should be changed.  However, the applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200 with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct," and the separation code is "JKQ."  Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation. 
        
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
        

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 10 August 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: An online application and USPS Notification of Personnel Action.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20120006634
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012980

    Original file (AR20100012980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011503

    Original file (AR20080011503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states, "My only issue is the discharge i Received is hindering me from getting a decent job. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, conditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board in that he receive a general discharge under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 27 February 2007, the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013295

    Original file (AR20080013295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 May 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for abuse of illegal drugs, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008542

    Original file (AR20100008542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110012128

    Original file (AR20110012128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011262

    Original file (AR20090011262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 24 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019895

    Original file (AR20110019895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I would go through basic and everything else again just to have to chance to show that I can be one of the best Soldiers out there. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016121

    Original file (AR20110016121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? He later changed his recommendation to separate the applicant with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. On 11 July 2006, an Administrative Separation Board determined that the applicant did commit a serious offense of using illegal drugs and recommended that the applicant be discharged with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022517

    Original file (AR20110022517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 February 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and indicated that he would be submitting a statement in his own behalf. The board recommended that the applicant be separated from the Army with a general, under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004487

    Original file (AR20120004487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 12 August 1998, the senior intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended the applicant's discharge be referred to an administrative separation board to consider whether the applicant should be separated from the Army. On 27 August 1998, the separation authority referred the applicant's discharge to a standing separation board to determined whether the applicant should be separated from the Army.