IN THE CASE OF:  	

      BOARD DATE:  	12 April 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20120020279
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.




      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge characterization from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and changed to the narrative reason for the discharge.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that one week before his unit deployed, he had asked and begged to go visit his grandfather with whom he had spent the last 8 years of his life before joining the Army.  He was a father figure for him and he was dehydrated and on his death bed, due to having a stroke from Alzheimer’s and malnutrition.  He asked to go visit him just for three days prior to deployment and was denied two times.  They were thinking that he was not going to return for deployment the following week.  He went into a deep depression and when he reached theater on February 15 he was thinking about suicide to get back at his unit for not allowing him to take emergency leave.  His platoon and squad leaders got him the help he needed and set him straight.  He wasn’t able to sleep correctly and it’s was probably because many people told him not to join the military because his grandpa was suffering from dementia.  He still has a guilt trip.  When he got back from theatre, he started using methamphetamine for the first time, and tried to overdose on it.  He tested positive on a urinalysis test and received an Article 15.  He was enrolled in ASAP and he completed his extra duty.  

He really wanted to get out and get back to his mom and grandma, but they wouldn’t let him go.  Once the other Soldiers found out what he had done, he was often ridiculed.  Once again he went into a depression and he turned to alcohol.  Now that he has been out, it’s really hard for him to get a good job because the type of discharge he received.  He has not touched any drugs for two years.  He should have received Chapter 6 for hardship conditions since his grandfather was in a “loco parentis” status.  

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		31 October 2012
b. Discharge Received:		General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge:			9 November 2010
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE:		Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, paragraph
      14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4        
e. Unit of assignment:			Bravo Company, 615th Aviation Support Battalion, 1st 					Air Cavalry Brigade, Fort Hood, TX
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:	17 March 2009, 05 years
g. Current Enlistment Service:	01 years, 07 months, 23 days
h. Total Service:			01 years, 07 months, 23 days
i. Time Lost:				None 
j. Previous Discharges:		None
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-3	
l. Military Occupational Specialty:	15B10 ACFT Power Plant Repairer
m. GT Score:				111
n. Education:				14 years 
o. Overseas Service:			SWA
p. Combat Service:			Iraq (100214-100430) 
q. Decorations/Awards:		NDSM, ICM-w/CS, GWOTSM, ASR, MUC
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		None
t. Counseling Statements:		Yes	
u. Prior Board Review:			No

SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		
	
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 March 2009, for a period of 5 years.  He was 23 years old at the time of entry and was a high school graduate with two years of college.  He was serving at Fort Hood, TX, when his discharge was initiated.  He did not have any personally earned awards in his service record and served in combat service for approximately two months.

SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES

1.  The evidence shows that on 13 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for receiving a field grade Article 15 on 18 August 2010, for wrongfully using 
D-Amphetamines and D-Methamphetamines.

2.  The unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights.  

3.  On 15 October 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and submitted a statement on his behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  

4.  On 25 October 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

5.  The applicant was discharged from the Army on 9 November 2010, for misconduct (drug abuse), under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c(2), with a RE code of 4.

6.  The applicant does not have any lost time.

 EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD

1.  The applicant received one field grade Article 15, dated 30 July 2010, for wrongfully using D-Amphetamines and D-Methamphetamines (between 100605-100607), his punishment consisted of a reduction to E-1; forfeiture of $700.00 pay per month for two months, suspended, extra duty and restriction for 45 days, and an oral reprimand.

2.  A negative counseling’s dated between 31 August 2010, for testing positive for D-Amphetamines and D-Methamphetamines.

3.  The record also contains a positive urinalysis coded as IU (Inspection Unit), dated 7 June 2010, that was positive for D-Amphetamines and D-Methamphetamines.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT 

The applicant provided an online DD Form 293, DD Form 214, three medical documents (psychiatric), a copy of a DA Form 4187, and a copy of a Death Certificate.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

The applicant states that it is difficult to find a job.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

2.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.

3.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1. The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge and changing the narrative reason was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s service record, and the issues and documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
2.  The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel; it brought discredit on the Army and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting an honorable discharge.  

3.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  

4.  The applicant contends the characterization of his discharge is affecting his life and his ability to obtain employment; however, the Board does not grant relief for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.   

5.  The record does not contain any indication or evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.   The character of the applicant’s discharge is commensurate with his overall service record.  

6.  Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service being both proper and equitable, recommend the Board deny relief. 


SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing: Records Review  	 Date:   12 April 2013    Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  No 

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Board Vote:
Character  	Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason	Change:  0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)


Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:	No
Change Characterization to: No Change	
Change Reason to:	No Change
Change RE Code to: No Change	
Grade Restoration to: No Change	
Change Authority for Separation:	NA


































Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions




ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20120020279



Page 6 of 6 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1