IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 June 2013
CASE NUMBER: AR20120019645
___________________________________________________________________________
Board Determination and Directed Action
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge to be proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
Presiding Officer
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.
THE APPLICANTS REQUEST AND STATEMENT:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to his reentry (RE) code.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he would like to reenlist. He takes full responsibility for his actions and states he had a drinking problem. More than 6 months have elapsed since his discharge and requests a second chance; he feels he was a good paratrooper.
DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:
a. Application Receipt Date: 19 October 2012
b. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge: 26 February 2009
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, 14-12c JKQ, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 1st Bn, 325th IN Regiment, Fort Bragg, NC
f. Enlistment Date/Term: 14 September 2007, 3 years and 21 weeks
g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 4 months, 23 days
h. Total Service: 1 year, 4 months, 23 days
i. Time Lost: 20 days
j. Previous Discharges: None
k. Highest Grade Achieved: E-2
l. Military Occupational Specialty: 11B1P, Infantryman
m. GT Score: 95
n. Education: HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service: None
p. Combat Service: None
q. Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
r. Administrative Separation Board: No
s. Performance Ratings: None
t. Counseling Statements: None
u. Prior Board Review: No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 September 2007, for a period 3 years and 21 weeks, he was 19 years old at the time and a high school graduate. When his discharge proceedings were initiated he was serving at Fort Bragg, NC. The record does not show any significant achievements or meritorious awards.
SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
1. The record shows that on 26 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), specifically for the following offenses:
a. Being absent without leave for 20 days (080909-080929)
b. Violating a regulation by providing alcohol to a Soldier under the age of 21
2. Based on the above misconduct the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights.
3. On 27 January 2009, the applicant was given the opportunity to consult with legal counsel, and seek advice as to the impact of the discharge action. The applicant provided a statement on his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
4. On 4 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
5. The applicant was discharged on 26 February 2009, for misconduct (serious offense), under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12c, with an SPD code of JKQ and a RE code of 3.
6. The applicants record contains an entry of 20 days of time lost for being AWOL (080909-080928); the mode of return is not in the record.
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD
1. A Field Grade Article 15 for being AWOL (080909-080920). His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $754.00 per month for 2 months, 45 days of extra duty and restriction.
2. A General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand dated 1 May 2008, for driving while impaired.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT
A self-authored statement.
POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY:
The applicant states that he is been working with a Recruiter to rejoin the Army.
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
1. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
2. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
3. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It identifies the SPD code of "JKQ" as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (serious offense).
5. The SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that a Soldier assigned an SPD Code of "JKQ" will be assigned a RE Code of 3.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
1. The applicants request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered. However, after examining the applicants service record, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
2. The record confirms the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. It brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline. By his repeated misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality his service below that meriting an honorable discharge.
3. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
4. The applicant has requested a change to the reentry code (RE) in order to rejoin the Army. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Based on AR 635-5-1 and the SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table the applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3. There are no basis upon which to grant a change to the reason or to the RE code. An RE Code of 3 indicates the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist. If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact a local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist. Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.
5. The applicant contends he had a drinking problem at at the time and did not how to handle it. However, he had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief and there is no evidence in the record that he ever sought such assistance before committing the misconduct which led to the separation action under review.
6. Finally, the applicant states that more than 6 months have elapsed since the discharge. However, the Army does not have, nor has it ever had, a policy to upgrade a discharge based on time elapsed since the discharge. Each case is decided on its own merits based on all factors contained in the official record or as submitted by the applicant. Changes may be warranted if the Board determines that the characterization of service or the reason for discharge or both were improper or inequitable.
7. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service being both proper and equitable, recommend the Board deny relief.
SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:
Type of Hearing: Personal Appearance Date: 3 June 2013 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes
Counsel: None
Board Vote:
Character Change: 1 No Change: 4
Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5
(Board member names available upon request)
Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214: No
Change Characterization to: No Change
Change Reason to: No Change
Change RE Code to: No Change
Grade Restoration to: NA
Change Authority for Separation: No Change
Other: NA
Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record FG - Field Grade IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NA - Not applicable SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge HS - High School NIF - Not in File SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15 HD - Honorable Discharge OAD - Ordered to Active Duty UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge
CID - Criminal investigation Department MP Military Police OMPF - Official Military Personnel File UOTH - Under Other Than Honorable
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont) AR 20120019645
Page 6 of 6 pages
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)
CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003699
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for going AWOL (081028-081103 and 080902-080909) stealing the cell phone of another Soldier, punching her in her jaw, and failure to report to his appointed place of duty on several occasions,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100020242
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010434
The applicant states, in effect, he served for two years and was discharged when he tested positive for marijuana. On 31 October 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007609
The applicant requests to upgrade his characterization of service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable, and to change the narrative reason for his discharge. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge or a change to the narrative reason for his discharge. The DD Form 214 also...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012674
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongfully appropriation of a POV (090124), and testing positive for marijuana (090429), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002681
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 30 April 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200 Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: Rear Detachment, 3-43rd ADA Bn, Fort Bliss, TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 8 October 2009, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 6 months, 3 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 3 months, 11 days i. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004768
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 29 January 2009 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, 14-12c JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 2d Battalion, 503d IN Regiment, Vicenza, Italy f. Enlistment Date/Term: 8 March 2006, 5 years and 19 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 9 months, 27 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 9 months, 27 days i. The record shows that on 12 January 2009, the unit commander notified...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012076
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 14 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense) for absenting himself from his unit from (080727-080912), beginning date of AWOL period should be 27 June 2007. On 6...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012350
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKQ (i.e., misconduct). Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080018052
On 27 August 2007, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge by reason of commission of a serious offense, directed the applicant's service be characterized as under other than honorable conditions, and indicated the Soldiers RE code would be RE-4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), then in effect, prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPDs...